Categories
Being Macho insults Key & Peele comedians

On Calling One’s Wife A Bitch

Welcome to From Insults To Respect.

Recently, a friend sent me the link for a YouTube comedy skit titled, “I Said Bitch.” It’s performed by the comedians, Key & Peele. Here’s the link.– https://youtu.be/5LGEiIL1__s.

It begins with Peele and a woman playing the part of Peele’s wife warmly greeting the arrival of Key and a woman playing the part of Key’s wife. When the wives go off together to see something new in Peele’s house, it leaves the two comedians alone to have the following conversation:

Key: Dude, I’m sorry that we’re late.
Peele: It happens, man.
Key: She (referring to his wife) talked about how we’re
suppose to be in the car by 6:45 and I say ‘alright’.
Peele: Uh Oh.
Key: Tell me my dumb ass ain’t sitting in the car until 7:15. Okay, when I track my wife down 20 minutes later, she’s stepping out of the shower talking about, can I help you? See, that’s crazy right there! Can I help you? I looked this woman right in the eye, I said, “Bitch, you told me 6:45.”

As Key says “Bitch, you told me 6:45,” both look to check to make sure their wives are not within earshot. As the conversation continues, Peele double checks to make sure he heard what was said by asking Key, “You said, ‘Bitch.'” Key replies, “Yeah.”

At this point we hear the wives coming and the guys, nervous that their wives might hear their discussion, decide to go down to the basement. There, Key continues expressing his frustration with his wife, and Peele expresses empathy, and then he shares a story in which his wife had acted in a way that led to frustration, and ending with him calling his wife a bitch. But before he gets to actually saying the “B” word, he looks cautiously around to make certain his wife won’t hear.

Just then, the wives look into the basement, and ask, “What are you boys up to?”

The boys, upon seeing them, immediately change their expression from outrage to delightful cheerfulness, and claim they were just talking about looking over the new washing machine that is in the basement.

Now, in order to continue their conversation in a place their wives won’t hear, the boys go outside, climb a tree, and hiding their lips behind the tree’s limb, they tell each other about other times their wives’ actions led to frustration, and it led to calling them bitches. But each time they claim to have used the “B” word, they pause to make absolutely certain their wives won’t hear them.

The humor is created by how self-righteous they look when telling of their frustration at their wives’ actions, and their contrasting look of terrible fearfulness at the prospect that their wives might overhear them engaging in this type of conversation. Their fearfulness leads them to go to extreme privacy places so they can safely continue their conversation, ending with them going up in a rocket to outer space, and even out there they fearfully look about each time they say the word bitch to make sure there is no way their wives will catch them.

The skit works because one can imagine real people having a somewhat similar experience; though, as comedies are apt to do, the characters’ actions are super exaggerated. From their actions, I got the impression that the characters being portrayed would never actually call their wives bitches. Nevertheless, I got to wondering why the two guys would value sharing with each other various times they claimed to have called their wives bitches. Why would they make such a claim to a friend? What value would they get from this? Why would they try to hide from their wives that they are making such a claim?

Perhaps they had adopted the desire to be macho, that is to be strong and to display dominance, aggression, and to not being nurturing. If you want to be macho, you seek to settle all differences with anger and violence as opposed to diplomacy. You treat your wife with displays of being tough and aloof.

If the two characters in the skit have adopted this desire and came to believe their friend has also, then calling their wives bitches would fit this attitude. However, if you really are crazy about your wife, then, although you might want to think you are macho and you might want your friend to think you are macho, you might find yourself in a bind. I think the skit is acting out two folks in this bind. They love their wives, know well that their wives won’t respect them if they call them bitches, but haven’t managed to relinquish their desire to be macho, especially when their wives have done something very frustrating.

This macho style is something with which I personally became very familiar as a boy growing up in Brooklyn, especially as a junior high student. There was a clear exception to the violence characteristic–it was definitely not okay for a boy to hit a girl. Occasionally girls got into physical “girl fights,” but the boys stayed out of these.

When I got to high school  and began dating, occasionally, I faced a frustrating conflict I had with a girl. I would become angry and during such episodes I would cry out an insult, typically something like, “You’re acting like a jerk!” or “You’re being an idiot!” More frequently, I would have these types of angry experiences with my stepdad.

I didn’t think I was doing anything wrong with such outbursts because it seemed to me the natural way to respond to such frustrations, and there was a theory going around that to suppress one’s emotions was harmful. However, during my last two years of college, I took psychology courses that included in the curriculum reviews of studies that described conflict resolution ideas. They didn’t require suppressing emotions, were less likely to lead to the conflict spinning out of control, and were more likely to lead to satisfactory outcomes.

I found initial attempts at utilizing such approaches often failed as my anger would lead me into old habits; but in time, and with practice, I got better and better at these alternatives. And they were so effective for me that when I retired from my job as a psychologist, I decided to write these blog posts as a noncommercial way to spread these ideas for free. I’m hoping you consider giving the approaches described a try.

On this blog, what would be the type of suggestion I might offer for dealing with the type of frustrating, angry conflict described in the Key and Peele skit? First, recognize you are frustrated and angry, and feel it fully within your body. Then, before confronting your wife, decide how to handle it in a way that won’t have lasting negative effects on your relationship. Rehearse three or four times in your mind the approach you came up with, taking care that you won’t include any insults or a tone of voice that comes off as insulting. A soft voice is usually best.

Here’s a suggestion for what you might say to your wife: “I’m feeling frustrated because we are going to be late for our friends’ get-together, and you told me to be in the car at 6:45 so we could be on time. I agreed, and after waiting there for a half hour, I now come up here and see you are just getting out of the shower.”

I would then pause to let my wife reply. Then I would softly summarize what she said, and then I would wait to see if she wants to add anything more. I would then leave the conversation at this point for the time being, thus giving my wife some time to think over my expressed frustration, as well as giving me time to calm down. In a day or two, I would consider if it makes sense to further the discussion.

This approach is very likely, in time, to lead to your wife feeling you treated her respectfully because you’ve given her time to express her views. Moreover, it recognizes that an extensive discussion about the issue when you are angry could lead to saying something you will end up regretting. And what you had prepared to say will be brief enough so a three or four repetition rehearsal can be effectively achieved.

Notice that with this approach, there is no suppression of your frustration and anger. Inwardly, your feelings are there, you express them fully to yourself, while avoiding weakening a relationship you care about.

Of course, there is far more to be said about handling such conflicts, but I leave the topic here, giving readers some ideas to reflect upon.

My Best,
Jeff

———————————
Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on. This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional intelligence. To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.

Categories
insults

Insults and Respect: What Are They?

Welcome to From Insults to Respect. 

As readers can readily see, this blog deals with issues related to insults and respect. Because I’ve assumed people readily know what they mean, in none of my previous posts have I bothered defining them. However, I recently asked some people what respect means, and found they hesitated, seemed unsure how to respond, or gave some vague answers. For example, one said she knows when she respects someone, then hesitated, and then requested some time to think about it before further replying. Another responded that she respects people who communicate well. Although I have some sense of what she means by this, I decided to seek some additional clarification.

To begin the process, because my adult son, Jack was conveniently visiting me for Thanksgiving, I turned to him to see how he defines respect. Jack replied, “When I’m feeling a person is living their life with integrity, or handles certain situations with integrity, I respect them.”

To encourage Jack to expand on his thoughts on this, I probed: “Think of someone you respect and don’t tell me who he or she is.” Once he thought of this person, I then asked him to tell me what he respects about that person. He replied, “The person lives a life with a strong intention of making the world a better place.”

I probed even further by asking Jack, “Can you think of something that would lead you to respect that person you are thinking of even more?” He replied: “If the person would be more present when he or she spends time with me.”

Hmm. Interesting.

Then I asked another person I know, a similar set of questions.

She said she defined respect as the admiration she feels for herself when living in alignment with her values and the admiration that she feels for others when they are living in alignment with her shared values.”

When I asked her the question about thinking of someone she respects without telling me who he or she is, and then tell me what is it about that person that has led to your respect, she replied, “This person lives with great integrity and humility. Also, that person never says an unkind word about anyone else. They take responsibility for their own actions, and walk their talk.”

When I probed further by asking her, “Can you think of something that would lead you to respect that person even more?” she replied, “Having even more compassion for themselves and their human imperfections.”

After this, I then decided to see what Wikipedia had to say on this subject. It replied:

An insult is an expression, statement, or behavior that is often deliberately disrespectful, offensive, scornful, or derogatory towards an individual or a group. Insults can be intentional or unintentional, and they often aim to belittle, offend, or humiliate the target. While insults may sometimes include factual information, such information is typically presented in a pejorative manner….

Respect, also called esteem, is a positive feeling or deferential action shown towards someone or something considered important or held in high esteem or regard. It conveys a sense of admiration for good or valuable qualities. It is also the process of honoring someone by exhibiting care, concern, or consideration for their needs or feelings.[1]

In many cultures, people are considered to be worthy of respect until they prove otherwise. Some people may earn special respect through their exemplary actions or social roles. In “honor cultures”, respect is more often earned in this way than granted by default.[2] Courtesies that show respect may include simple words and phrases like “thank you” in the West or “namaste” in the Indian subcontinent, or simple physical signs like a slight bow, a smile, direct eye contact, or a handshake. Such acts may have very different interpretations depending on the cultural context. The end goal is for all people to be treated with respect.

This strikes me as a pretty good answer, but I’d like to add a few more ideas.

Some people respect those of us who say they are always happy. It certainly feels nice when we are happy. But once I read a chapter in a book titled Living Philosophies: A Series of Intimate Credos, and the first chapter is by Albert Einstein. There he states in part:

The ideals which have always shone before me and filled me with the joy of living are goodness, beauty, and truth.  To make a goal of comfort or happiness has never appealed to me; a system of ethics built on this basis would be sufficient for a herd of cattle.

Then I read the rest of Einstein’s chapter, and came away with the following image. He viewed happiness as one-half of an oscillation process, with sadness and happiness going back and forth, thrusting his ship forward, and where he chose to steer his ship was in the direction that led to goodness, beauty, and truth. This struck me as a deeper way to view the nature of happiness, and for those of us who want to be respected for being deep, in contrast to shallow, I think that there may be some value in meditating on this.

I always liked Ralph Waldo Emerson’s thoughts on this topic:

Emerson

The purpose of life is not to be happy. It is to be useful, to be honorable, to be compassionate, to have it make some difference that you have lived and lived well.

I dare say, I find myself respecting folks more who strive for these goals than merely always seeking happiness.

Finally, I tend to respect adults more who act in a manner consistent with how I view psychological maturity:

Psychological maturity is “better” in the long run, it considers more variables, and represents more comprehensive cognitive problem solving. Individuals who tend to act at higher levels of psychological maturity can think more critically, logically, and scientifically while acting civilly to people with whom they disagree; they can graciously admit they are wrong when information comes in supporting such a conclusion; they welcome receiving criticism, respond without getting defensive, though they know it can be emotionally concerning for them; they are hesitant to provide uninvited criticism, only doing so when they can formulate it in a way that promises to be specific enough to be helpful, and they do so without insulting tones of voice or name calling; they can role-play and empathize with the emotions of a wide variety of human beings and can process moral dilemmas according to standards of democratic justice and the golden rule; they understand that melancholy and anxiety, rather than symptoms of mental disorders, are part of the natural process of addressing concerns about losses and fears; and they have the ability to puzzle through the tough problems of living, to take a stand, and yet to remain open to possible revisions and new information—thus demonstrating a capacity to make successive approximations toward more efficient, effective, economical, and beautiful accomplishments.

Although I respect people who display behavior consistent with these principles, I strive to treat everyone I meet respectfully.

Well, there you have it, some thoughts regarding the concepts of insults and respect. My whole blog, of course, goes into these ideas in far more detail. Here, we just explored some definitions. I hope you find them useful. As always, I love to hear from readers on this and all of my posts.

My Best,
Jeff


Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on. This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional intelligence. To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.

Categories
Abraham Lincoln conflict resolution insults

How Lincoln Handled Insults

Welcome to From Insults to Respect.

About nine years ago I began this blog, and one of the first sets of words that I wrote were:

We have all experienced name calling, insults and teasing, even the greatest presidents, the most talented athletes, and every member of your favorite band.  If someone insults you, calls you names, or teases you, it does NOT mean that you are a bad person.

Although being treated disrespectfully does not mean that you are a bad person, skillful handling of these types of situations can have an enormous influence on how much you are liked and respected by others, and how you regard yourself as a person. 

Since then, I have published quite a few posts that offered suggestions for handling this sometimes difficult type of situation (for example see HERE, HERE, and HERE). Now, as I was wondering what to write about for this week’s post, I noticed C-SPAN had just announced the results of its latest survey that had historians and other professional observers of the presidency rate U.S. presidents. Abraham Lincoln, consistent with many previous surveys over the years, came out on top. And it just so happens that I have been reading of late, Carl Sandburg’s biography of Lincoln. In its many pages, we find regularly Lincoln dealing with people throwing insults at him. So, I thought I would take this opportunity to share with you how this highly respected person dealt with them.

Examples of Lincoln Dealing with Insults

Stanton’s Insults

Secretary Stanton

Edwin M. Stanton served as Secretary of War during the Civil War, and in the early part of his tenure in that position he regularly threw insults at President Lincoln. At one point, for example, according to Sandburg’s Lincoln biography, Stanton angrily called his boss behind his back the original gorilla. When told about this by someone who was furious that Lincoln would let one of his subordinates insult him, Lincoln replied, “Now, now, Stanton is entitled to his opinion.” Then, with a twinkle in his eyes, Lincoln went on to say, “What concerns me is that I have found that when Stanton says something, he is usually right,” and with that, Lincoln brought forth a delightful smile.

A similar occasion occurred at another point, according to The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History records,

Congressman Lovejoy

A committee of Western men, headed by [Congressman Owen] Lovejoy, procured from the President an important order looking to the exchange of Eastern and Western soldiers with a view to more effective work. Repairing to the office of Secretary Stanton, Mr. Lovejoy explained the scheme, as he had done before to the President, but was met by a flat refusal.

“But we have the President’s order sir,” said Lovejoy.

“Did Lincoln give you an order of that kind?” said Stanton.

“He did, sir.”

“Then he is a d—d fool,” said the irate Secretary.

“Do you mean to say the President is a d—d fool?” asked Lovejoy, in amazement.

“Yes, sir, if he gave you such an order as that.”

The bewildered Congressman from Illinois betook himself at once to the President, and related the result of his conference.

“Did Stanton say I was a d–d fool?” asked Lincoln at the close of the recital.

“He did, sir; and repeated it.”

After a moment’s pause, and looking up, the President said: “If Stanton said I was a d–d fool, then I must be one, for he is nearly always right, and generally says what he means. I will step over and see him.”

Now, you may be starting to get the impression that Lincoln would let Stanton bully him, but that appears to not be the case, as we can see from the following example, also from The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History:

General James Fry, a War Department official who had frequent opportunity to observe the relations between the two men, noted such anecdotes were “interpreted as meaning that Lincoln could not control Stanton. The inference is erroneous. Lincoln, so far as I could discover, was in every respect the actual head of the administration, and whenever he chose to do so, he controlled Stanton as well as all the other Cabinet ministers.” Fry related a conflict between President Lincoln and Secretary Stanton which concluded with the following dialogue in Stanton’s office. Stanton said: “Now Mr. President, those are the facts, and you must see that your order cannot be executed.” The President cordially replied: “Mr. Secretary, I reckon you’ll have to execute the order.” Stanton objected: “Mr. President, I cannot do it. The order is an improper one, and I cannot execute it.” The President stared down the shorter Stanton and firmly issued an order: “Mr. Secretary, it will have to be done.” And indeed it was.

We get a little glimpse of Lincoln’s perspective of how he thought it best to handle Stanton when he got angry and began to throw out insults, from the following:

Senator Dawes

Henry Dawes dropped in on the President after the appointment was announced to congratulate him on getting such a man as Stanton for his Cabinet, in the next breath making some remark that led Lincoln to say, yes, there were those who had warned him that the new Secretary of War would run away with the whole concern. “We may have to treat him as they are sometimes obliged to treat a Methodist minister I know of out West. He gets wrought to so high a pitch of excitement in his prayers and exhortations that they are obliged to put bricks in his pockets to keep him down. We may be obliged to serve Stanton in the same way, but I guess we’ll let him jump a while first.”

As Lincoln got more and more familiar with Secretary Stanton’s intense, irritable nature, he made allowances for it because he knew how the excitement of the time tried men’s tempers and shattered their nerves. And yet, there were times Lincoln could not just ignore how Stanton was reacting to someone. On one occasion, Stanton was particularly angry with one of the generals.

“I would like to tell him what I think of him!” he stormed.

“Why don’t you?” Mr. Lincoln agreed. “Write it all down – do.”

Mr. Stanton wrote his letter. When it was finished he took it to the President. The President listened to it all.

All right. Capital!’ Lincoln nodded. “And now, Stanton, what are you going to do with it?”

Do with it? Why, send it, of course!”

“I wouldn’t,” said the President. “Throw it in the waste-paper basket.”

“But it took me two days to write —”

Yes, yes, and it did you ever so much good. You feel better now. That is all that is necessary. Just throw it in the basket.”

After a little more expostulation, into the basket it went.

Perhaps Lincoln, when he himself got worked up either because someone threw some insult at him, or for any other reason, also wrote letters of this sort to help him work out his feelings.

Insults By Others

General Grant

Stanton was, by no means, the only one to insult Lincoln. At one point, the president was confronted by a hail of insults for supporting U.S. Grant. The chief objection to the general was that he was thought to be intemperate with whiskey. Lincoln replied, “If I knew what brand of whiskey he drinks I would send a barrel or so to some of the other generals,” and then he leaned back in his chair and had a laugh.

In an excellent article in the journal, The Atlantic, titled “‘Idiot,’ ‘Yahoo,’ ‘Original Gorilla’: How Lincoln Was Dissed in His Day, we learn that Lincoln’s writing, so admired today, led to many an insult directed at him. Thus, the article reports:

No American president has uttered more immortal words than he did. We are moved by the power and lyricism of his speeches a century and a half later—not just by their hard, clear reasoning, but by their beauty. It is hard to imagine anyone hearing without admiration, for instance, this sublime passage from the first inaugural address:

I am loth to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield, and patriot grave, to every living heart and hearthstone, all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.

Yet this speech was characterized by an editorial writer in the Jersey City American Standard as “involved, coarse, colloquial, devoid of ease and grace, and bristling with obscurities and outrages against the simplest rules of syntax.”

Later in this section of The Atlantic article we learn:

As for the Gettysburg Address—one of the most powerful speeches in human history, one that many American schoolchildren can recite by heart (Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth …) and a statement of national purpose that for some rivals the Declaration of Independence—a Pennsylvania newspaper reported, “We pass over the silly remarks of the President. For the credit of the nation we are willing that the veil of oblivion shall be dropped over them, and they shall be no more repeated or thought of.” A London Times correspondent wrote, “Anything more dull and commonplace it wouldn’t be easy to produce.”

These insulting remarks were, at times, met with a humorist quip. For example, Stephen Douglas called him two faced during a debate and Lincoln responded “If I had another face, do you think I would wear this one?” At other times, he would respond to the flood of nay-saying with a weary wave of his hand and say, “Let us speak no more of these things.”

Conclusion

I think Alexander Hamilton Stephens, who had served as the Vice President of the Confederacy, well expressed what many who had an opportunity to get to know Lincoln came to feel about him. Thus, in a speech several years after the war, Stephens recalled getting to know Lincoln when they both served together in the House of Representatives prior to the war. “He was warm hearted; he was generous; he was magnanimous, ‘with malice toward none, with charity for all.'”

As Stanton declared at Lincoln’s death bed, with tears in his eyes, “He was one for the ages.”

All of that being said, it is my hope these Lincoln stories might inspire you when you find yourself confronted with insults. With Lincoln as an example, perhaps you might find yourself coming up with a few jests that can be employed as insults come your way, just to lighten things up a bit. And perhaps you might find yourself considering the wisdom of looking to see if there is any merit imbedded in any nasty phrased comment, kind of like what Lincoln did when he declared that he better step over to discuss the matter with Stanton after Stanton had thrown an insult at him.

Let me add, now, some personal advice. If you find, as a result of a nasty remark, that you need to spend a little time experiencing waves of distress in the pit of your stomach, take all the time that you need. Meanwhile, consider writing about what you might wish to say to the insulter. And by all means, avoid falling into the trap that an insult can define you as bad.

In closing today’s post, I shall leave you with some words by Rudyard Kipling that appears as part of his poem titled “If.” They seem to me to capture some of the essential character of Abraham Lincoln:

If you can keep your head when all about you   
    Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,   
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
    But make allowance for their doubting too;   
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
    Or being lied about, don’t deal in lies,
Or being hated, don’t give way to hating,
    And yet don’t look too good, nor talk too wise,
….
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,   
    And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!
My Best,
Jeff
———————————
Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on. This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional intelligence. To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.
Categories
conflict resolution insults respect Responding to Criticism

Is Viewing Someone As Acting Immature Insulting?

Welcome to From Insults To Respect. 

As someone with considerable training in developmental psychology, I sometimes view certain styles of behavior on a scale ranging from immature to mature. When I do that, might I be insulting those who I view as acting immature? For those of you, who like me, prefer not to insult anyone, I invite you to join me in considering this question.

Let’s begin with the following scenario:

In the above scenario, when Andy calls Marsha immature, does he insult her?

Hmmm.  Before answering this question, I think I’ll first take a little peek over here in my Webster’s College Dictionary.

Considering Webster’s Definitions of “Insult”

I see here that one definition of insult is “a deliberately discourteous or rude remark or act that humiliates, wounds the feelings, and arouses anger: an insult about her foreign accent.”  I see that there are other definitions as well.  I think I’ll spend a little time first considering this one, and then I’ll take a look at another definition.

Well, with this definition, I guess I can’t be sure just from looking at the pictures if Andy is deliberately trying to be discourteous or rude. And so, I’m not sure if he insulted her.

One way to interpret the two-picture scenario is that Andy became defensive at Marsha’s comment and in anger he deliberately tried to punish her by acting rude.  In that case, if Marsha reacted to Andy’s comment by feeling humiliated or wounded, then it seems to me that according to the definition I’m considering, Andy did insult Marsha.

Interestingly, even if Andy deliberately tried to punish her by acting rude, if Marsha didn’t react by feeling humiliated or wounded, with the definition that I’m currently considering, I would say that he did not insult her.

Another way to interpret the two-picture scenario, although less plausible to me, is that Andy genuinely believes that a mature woman does not mind her husband flirting.  If Andy, after saying, “Marsha, you’re acting immature,” gently explained his belief about this while remaining loving and caring toward Marsha, would his comment about her being immature still be an insult?  Not according to the definition that I am considering because he did not deliberately try to be discourteous or rude.  She might have felt insulted, but he did not insult her.

I see here that Webster does provide us another definition for insult–“something having the effect of an affront: That book is an insult to one’s intelligence.”

In that definition, it doesn’t matter if Andy is being deliberately discourteous or rude.  respect4If Marsha reacts to Andy’s comment as if it was disrespectful and an open offense to her dignity, then he has insulted her.  And, even if Andy deliberately wanted to be discourteous and rude, if Marsha did not react as if she had received an affront, then we could say that Andy’s comment did not insult her.  Perhaps we can say instead that Andy tried to insult Marsha, but failed.

My Personal Experience with Insults

Dr Jeffrey Rubin

An interesting thing about my own life is that when I was young, if someone tried to insult me, it usually worked–in that I indeed ended up feeling insulted.  As I got older–dare I say, more mature–I became less and less likely to feel insulted, even if someone called me stupid or an idiot.

I have become, over the years, more and more comfortable with who I am as a person, and I don’t rely as much on the opinions of others when judging my own worth.  I’m still very much interested in what other people have to say about me because I believe I can learn a great deal from these types of discussions. But I respect myself for having this attribute. And I don’t often automatically assume that a negative evaluation from others makes me a bad person.

My Blog, Immaturity and Insults

Let’s consider another scenario.

“Judy, it’s so nice to see you,” I say as she comes into my office and sits down on my couch.

“I read one of your blog posts last night, Dr. Rubin–the one titled, Providing Negative Criticism: Five Levels of Maturity.  You say in it that if a person provides negative criticism by using name calling, insults, and shouting, that’s immature.  Well, I sometimes use name calling, insults and shouting when I criticize my kids and my husband. That means that in your blog post, you insulted me, calling me immature.  Calling me immature is calling me a name, and an insulting one at that.  So you’re as immature as I am!”

“I think I understand what you are saying, Judy.  Do you feel that I was trying to deliberately be discourteous or rude to you?”

“Maybe not deliberately, but what you said in your blog post felt like you were being insulting, and I felt insulted.”

“Well, Judy, I didn’t mean to be discourteous or rude.  I certainly am not trying to do anything that tears you down–just the opposite.”

“I know, but calling people immature is insulting.”

“Well, Judy, I don’t want you to continue to feel that I am insulting you, so let’s see what we can do differently.”

“OK.”

“Now, to begin with, let’s quickly review why you have been coming to see me. As I recall, you were concerned about how you were getting along with your husband and kids and you wanted me to help you to address this–is that right?”

“Yes.”

“Now, during my training on how to help people with this type of concern, I had professors who viewed themselves as developmental psychologists.  These professors view people as going through different developmental stages or levels, moving from relatively immature levels to more mature levels.  They didn’t merely name each level, they did their best to go beyond the name to describe each higher level so that people, if they chose to do so, could have enough information to make some life changes.

Although I like this approach, I had some other professors that taught me how to use a couple of other approaches that I think can be very helpful, and they don’t bother with words like immature and mature.  For example, one approach would have you stop reading my blog, and when you visit my office I’ll listen to you in a caring, supportive way.  From time to time, I’ll ask you a few questions to challenge you to think more deeply about the issues that you are raising.  When you reply, I won’t give you my opinion. Instead, I’ll listen and empathize with what you are experiencing.”

“Well, actually, I look forward to reading your blog each week, Dr. Rubin.  They make me angry some of the time, but I must admit that they’ve been very helpful.  As far as just listening to me in a caring way, you already do a lot of that.  If I want your opinion, I ask and I guess I want you to be honest and tell me what you really think.”

“All right, Judy.  Another thing that we can try is this. Some people, when they are provided negative criticism, always feel insulted even when the criticism is provided without any name calling, insults and shouting.  Other people, even when they are provided negative criticism with name calling, insults and shouting don’t feel insulted.  Attempts to insult them are like water off of a duck’s back. These people can hear the negative criticism that comes with efforts to humiliate and wound their feelings, and they can seek to learn something from the criticism. Sometimes they do experience some strong emotions that arise when they hear the negative criticism, but this is experienced not as humiliation, but, instead, as an experience that helps them to come up with more efficient, effective, economical and beautiful accomplishments.  If you want, over the next few weeks we can work on this.”

“I like that, Dr Rubin. I do think I’m a bit too sensitive about criticism.  Let’s give that approach a try.”

“OK.”

Conclusion

Dr Jeffrey Rubin

Well, I guess, after considering all of this, I’ve decided to continue to view certain behavior patterns in a developmental framework. To my readers, I don’t mean to insult you when I refer to a pattern that you might utilize as immature, but rather, I hope to challenge you to consider some alternative pattern that you may find better in some ways. For those who are interested in my definition of psychological maturity, see HERE.

So, with that, thanks for stopping by today at From Insults To Respect, and may the rest of your week be filled with wonder and delight.

———————————-

Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on.  This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional and social intelligence.  To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.

Categories
conflict resolution insults Name calling Obesity over weight

On Being Viewed As “Fat”

Welcome to From Insults to Respect. Recently, I’ve been reading about the trials and tribulations of being viewed as fat. For example, in a Psychology Today article titled “Is Your Child Being Teased About His Weight?” the author, Edward Abramson, Ph.D., tells us that,

“Although the medical consequences of childhood obesity may not emerge until adulthood, the psychological effects are immediately present. Studies have shown that discrimination against overweight kids begins in kindergarten or earlier. One study of five year-olds found that they described an overweight child as ‘lazy, dirty, stupid, and ugly.’ A new study found that 4 – 8 year old children were less likely to help overweight peers with everyday tasks like picking up toys. Another study reported that virtually all overweight teenage girls had been verbally abused. College students when asked to rate the desirability of a potential spouse rated cocaine users, embezzlers, and shoplifters as better marriage partners than an obese person.”

In another article, this one titled, “Being Called FAT. It Hurts. And You Don’t Forget,” Cassey Ho, a fitness instructor, tells us about a teenager who described her experience as follows:

“I was at a family birthday party, we were all eating together at this long table with all sorts of wonderful foods laid out. I was thoroughly enjoying my plate along with my mom and sister. Then this little girl who was probably a year or two younger than me looks at me and says ‘Why are you so fat?’

“I stopped chewing. My eyes welled up with tears. The edges of my lips curled and I fought the quivering frown overcoming my face. I dropped my fork. Ran into another room. Cried. The kind of crying where you can’t stop and you can’t breathe.”

When we meet someone we care about who is dealing with this kind of challenging experience, is there anything that we can do that can be helpful? To address this question, I’m going to present a little scenario that kinda describes what I have done over the years when I found myself providing counseling to someone dealing with this issue. In saying the scenario “kinda” describes what I have done I mean to indicate that it really is, by necessity, a shortened description of what actually occurs in my actual counseling sessions. More specifically, in real life sessions I spend distinctly more intervals of time listening in a caring way than we will see in the scenario. I ask more questions to clarify what specifically occurred in any event being described. I am more likely to slightly rephrase what the person had said so they see that I understand what I have been listening to, thus reassuring them I’m really deeply listening. A full rendition of such a counseling session would be a fifty-minute read, way too long for our purposes.

In presenting the scenario, I hasten to mention that it is not my intention to declare that it presents the ideal approach to being helpful. It is merely offered as a useful way to set up a model that can be critiqued. I encourage readers to freely suggest any improvements, and to point out where, in their estimation, I went astray.

The Counseling Scenario

Heather, a 17 year-old high school student, arrived for her weekly counseling session.

“How are you doing?” I ask as she sits down.

Heather folds her arms as if she’s holding herself. Her mouth curves downward. There’s a slight twitching at its corners. Her eyes begin to water.

“You’re looking mighty sad,” I say. “Did something happen?”

“While my mom was driving me here, I took out a candy bar, and she told me I shouldn’t eat it because I was getting fat. Do you think I’m getting fat?”

“Heather, I like you just the way you are.”

“How can you like me? Look at how fat I am!”

“Oh, it’s very possible for me to like and respect people who weigh more than the average person. One of my favorite actresses is Hattie McDaniel who surely weighed more than you. She played parts in numerous movies such as ‘Gone with the Wind’ and ‘Show Boat.’ It wasn’t just me who delighted in her character portrayals, many producers must have liked her too because they selected her to play in over 300 movies, and her peers selected her to win an Academy Award. She wasn’t just a movie actress, she also was a singer and song writer as well. The United States honored her with a U.S. postage stamp for her contributions to the arts.

President Taft

“William Howard Taft weighed far more than you, well over 300 pounds. Despite that, the American people selected him to be our 27th president. After that, he was selected to be Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, certainly one of the most respected positions in the country. So, people can surely like and respect people who weigh more than average.”

“You, and others might like and respect some people heavier than average,” Heather hastens to say, “but I bet you didn’t ask them out on dates.”

“Well, when I first started to date, I did have in mind asking out only women who matched the ideal Hollywood romantic lead image, and they did tend to have narrow waistlines. They also had faces that can lead one to drift into a dream. As it turned out, there were not a whole lot of such women around my neighborhood, and yet I did start to date. On some scales, those that I dated did not match the perfect Hollywood type here or there but I found I was still attracted to them. In time I got to know things about them that transcended mere looks. When I met my wife, she was wearing braces on her teeth, hardly a classic Hollywood look.

“And judging from my observations, most women that I knew during my dating days were willing to go out with guys who didn’t look exactly like Cary Grant or Robert Redford. After a while they found someone that had looks that fell short of what some might think of as perfect in every way, and nevertheless, they fell in love and got married.

“So, that’s my take on these questions you’ve been posing to me. Perhaps more important is how you have been feeling and thinking about these issues. Would it be okay if we switched to focus on this?”

“I guess.”

“Good. So, tell me a little more about how you felt when your mother said you were getting fat.”

“It felt awful.”

“You don’t like the idea that you might be becoming heavier than you would like?”

“I hate it!”

“Do you think you are becoming fat?”

Here, Heather pauses, and her face starts to turn a bit purple. After a few seconds, she says, “Lately, when I see myself in a mirror, I view myself as being fat.”

“I see.” I pause here for a few seconds, just experiencing within me strong empathy for what Heather has been going through, and also seeking a way toward some peace with it.

Then I say, “I think it would be helpful if we tried a little mindfulness exercise here. It’s quite simple. I’d like you to close your eyes for one minute and just focus on the physical sensations that you experience when recalling how you felt when your mom said you were getting fat, and how you have been feeling when you look in the mirror. I’ll also close my eyes for that minute and focus on my own physical sensations when I recall someone saying something to me that I found stressful and how I’ve been feeling when I look in a mirror. Would you be okay if we tried this little exercise?”

“Okay, I guess. What good would that do?”

“The exercise comes from several ancient wisdom traditions. It is part of what has been called ‘mindfulness.’ There is a theory that it deepens our stressful experiences in a way that perhaps leads us to take some positive actions to deal better with them.”

“Well, I guess if it will only take a minute.”

“Good. So, let’s close our eyes and focus on the stressful experiences we have just been talking about, focussing more on the physical sensations in a non-judgmental manner. I’ll keep track of the time. If you desire, at any time, to open your eyes, feel free to do so. You don’t have to keep them closed, but it is more relaxing and less distracting if you have them closed most of the time.”

“Okay.”

When the minute is up, I let Heather know that it was time to open our eyes. Then I ask her to describe what she had experienced.

“As I thought about what my mom said, I felt a tightness in my stomach and I noticed my hands squeezed very tightly into fists. When I thought about looking into the mirror, I felt like crying.”

“Anything else that you noticed on a physical level?”

“No. That’s about it. How about you, Dr. Rubin? What happened on a physical level with you.”

“I recalled when I was young I had the opposite problem than you, because people called me, in a nasty way, a ‘Skinny Marrink.’ I found, on a physical level I felt a kinda twisting sensation in the center and upper chest, and a tightness in the back of my neck. And when I thought about how I’ve been feeling when I look in the mirror, I felt a grieving sensation about my hair thinning and how much older I look, and I found on a physical level that I let out a long sigh, and then my lips tightened, and I sighed once again.”

At this, Heather smiles, and then she catches herself doing it, and she says, “I didn’t mean to smile at your distress, it’s just, well I guess I felt a little comforted hearing that even you can be stressed out about your looks.”

“Even me?”

“Well, that you’re a doctor and all.”

“I see. I suppose that’s understandable.”

Then Heather says, “When I was focussing on my physical sensations, I did think that if I don’t like how fat I’m getting, I oughta do something about it. It is healthier to not be overweight. Can you help me to come up with a plan?”

“If you like, we could work on that together. I think we would want to include not only eating less, but also eating healthy foods and getting sufficient exercise.”

“That makes sense to me, Dr. Rubin.”

Conclusion

So, there you have it, a scenario of one counselor’s effort to be helpful when someone was dealing with being viewed as fat. I hope that it was apparent in the scenario that I sought to listen in a caring manner, and remain supportive, respectful, and accepting.

Did I ask the right questions? Did I say something that you feel is wrong? Do you have any suggestions for improving the session? I encourage you all to speak up and express your views in the comment section. No one is going to bite you on this blog, I can assure you of that.

In any case, may you all find someone who will show you kindness as you meet up with all of your challenging experiences.

Jeff

———————————
Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on. This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional intelligence. To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.

Categories
conflict resolution criticism Disagreements incivility at work insults Levels of Maturity Stephen Colbert Supreme Cort Justices Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer

Supreme Court Justices Dealing with Their Disagreements

SeedlingsOn this blog, we have been discussing the question, “Is it possible that there are immature and mature ways to handle our disagreements?” To help answer this question, I have, very tentatively, proposed five levels of maturity for providing criticism (see here) and five levels of maturity for responding to criticism (see here and here).

In defending these levels of maturity, I have pointed out that I have made videotapes of individuals acting out scenarios in which they portray characters who are dealing with disagreements. In some, the actors use a style that match the more immature levels, and in others, they use a style that match the more mature levels. video-watchingI have found that independent viewers of these videotapes tend to rate the actors as more likable and respected when they displayed a style that match the descriptions of the higher levels of maturity.

golden ruleI have used some other arguments, as well. For example, I asked people to consider the golden rule, and then ask themselves, “When I criticize someone, how would I like the other party to ideally respond?”  Most people clearly prefer that the other party would respond in a manner that is very consistent with the higher levels of maturity that I have outlined on this blog.

As I continue to write about these issues, I’m always on the lookout for other ways to bring home the idea that there are indeed mature and immature ways to provide and respond to criticism.

Supreme Court Justice Breyer Interview with Stephen Colbert
Supreme Court Justice Breyer Interview with Stephen Colbert

Well, with this in mind, recently I happened to be watching the Late Show with Stephen Colbert and he had as a guest, Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. The two got to discussing how the justices deal with their own disagreements, and as it turned out, it seems to me that it is relevant to the maturity discussion. After all, supreme court justices are selected from among the most highly regarded judges in our land, and they surely get plenty of practice dealing with disagreements. So, for your consideration, here’s the transcript of the Late Show discussion (For those who would like to see the entire exchange themselves, it can be viewed on Youtube here).

The Late Show Discussion Between Colbert and Supreme Court Justice Breyer

BreyerLateShow.jpg.CROP.promo-xlarge2Colbert: Let’s talk about disagreeing. You go to work everyday, and manage to get your job done with a group of nine people, half of whom disagree with you vehemently on a host of different issues. How do you guys manage to keep doing your job while the rest of the government can’t?

Justice Breyer: When we are sitting around that table, well, I don’t know about, let’s leave the rest of the government out of it, but I’ll say that when the rest of us are sitting around that table discussing, the nine of us discussing, I’ve been there over 20 years, 21, I have never heard a voice raised in anger, I have never heard one member of our court say something insulting about another, not even as a joke. Of course we disagree. We disagree about half the time; we’re unanimous about half the time; and we’re 5 to 4, and it’s not always the same 4, maybe 20 percent or so, and we feel it possibly quite strongly, but the discussion is professional, it is serious, but it is not personal, and we are good friends despite the fact that we agree some of the time and we disagree others of the time.

How Does Supreme Court Justice Breyer’s Description of How the Members of the Court Handle Their Disagreements Match this Blog’s Description of Mature Ways to Deal with Disagreements?

On this blog, one of the most mature ways to provide criticism is described as follows:

Illustration by Deanna Martinez

The criticizer states the criticism without bodily attacks, damaging property, glares, insults, threats, or shouts, and with enough details so that the criticized person, if he or she wills, can improve the behavior, idea, or appearance.  If the person receiving the criticism becomes defensive or angry, the criticizer empathizes without returning, glares, insults, threats, or shouts.

One of the most mature ways to respond to criticism, as described on this blog is:

People at this level listen to the criticizer in a supportive, warm, friendly style, and then make it clear that they fully understand what was said.  Moreover, they put the criticizer at ease by making statements that indicate that the wise learn from criticism.  Some time is spent on showing that they are thinking about the criticism.  If, after thinking about the criticism the criticism is deemed to be correct, they make a statement frankly indicating, “I can see your ideas have merit and I intend to use them in the future.”  If they are not sure if they agree, they make a statement indicating that they are very interested in what was said, plan to think a little more about this over the next few days and then they will be ready to discuss this further.  If, after thinking about the criticism, the criticism is deemed to be incorrect, a statement is made designed to disagree without being disagreeable.  More specifically, a sense of humor, some listening in a caring way and a few smiles help to traverse rough terrain.  As the episode winds down, the criticizer is encouraged to feel comfortable communicating suggestions in the future.

BreyerObviously Justice Breyer’s comment about his court’s style of dealing with disagreements was brief. When you are on a show like The Late Show, it is understandable that replies to questions must be fairly brief, and in a conversational manner. So, we can’t say with certainty that his response is a perfect match with this blog’s description of a mature style. But note that in over 20 years, despite regularly disagreeing with one another, he never heard a voice raised in anger, or heard one member of our court say something insulting about another, not even as a joke. And he mentioned, as well, that they are all good friends. This seems an excellent match with the phrase in this blog’s description of a mature response to criticism that states, “People at this level listen to the criticizer in a supportive, warm, friendly style.”

In my view, the way Justice Breyer describes the style used by the Supreme Court Justices to discuss their disagreements is well worth thinking about as we think about our own style for discussing disagreements.

Well, those are some thoughts for today. May all of my readers have a wonderful week, and here’s to hoping you’ll join us again real soon on “From Insults to Respect.”

Jeff

———————————-

Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on.  This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional and social intelligence.  To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.

Categories
anger Bullied bullying conflict resolution emotional maturity insults interpersonal conflicts Name calling providing negative criticism social skills sports coaching

Abusive Criticism In Big Time Sports

bryce1It’s the bottom of the eighth inning. The talented star, Bryce Harper, front runner for the National League Most Valuable Player Award, hits a pop fly to left field that a professional outfielder is very likely to catch. However, there are times when such fielders do lose the ball in the sun or the stadium lights, and the ball ends up being dropped, allowing the batter to safely reach base if he had bothered to run. It is for this reason that Mr. Harper is supposed to hustle down to first base even if he has a pretty good reason to think that the ball he hit is, in all likelihood, going to be caught. Instead of sprinting down to first, Mr. Harper slowly steps out of the batter’s box and then heads to the dugout where he runs into a very angry teammate, Jonathan Papelbon.

Papelbon-chokeAccording to several sports reporters, Mr. Papelbon, an incredibly talented pitcher, began to criticize Mr. Harper about his lack of hustle, and after a very brief exchange, he charged into Mr. Harper, putting his hands on his throat and shoving him into the back wall of the Washington dugout. Fortunately, Mr. Harper was still wearing his batting helmet because his head smacked hard into the wall, and his helmet came flying off. Several Nationals players and coaches responded immediately and physically separated the two.

How Mature was Mr. Papelbon’s Style of Providing Negative Criticism in this Situation?

Regular readers of this blog know that when it comes to providing negative criticism, we are encouraged to consider a tentative model that describes five levels of maturity. Level one is viewed as the most immature, and each higher level is viewed as a little more mature. Let’s take a quick look at these levels, and as we do so, let’s see if we can figure out which of the five levels best describes Mr. Papelbon’s approach.

PROVIDING NEGATIVE CRITICISM:  FIVE LEVELS OF MATURITY

1. The criticizer displays one or more of the following behaviors:

  • Cries without stating what the crying is about
  • Physically attacks the person being criticized
  • Damages property

 

 

 

 

 

    2.  Those who are at this level display one or both of the following behaviors:

  • The criticizer does not explain what the offending behavior is, but instead expresses displeasure with glares, insults, shouting, silence, or threats that do not involve bodily harm. (For example, someone might be making too much noise and the criticizer might turn to the noise maker and glare, or cry out, “Jerk!”)
  • Threatens bodily harm regardless of what else is said.

      

 

3. Those who are at this level clearly state the criticism with enough detail so the criticized person, if he or she wills, can improve the behavior, idea, or appearance, but couple it with glares, insults, shouts, or threats that are not about bodily harm.

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.  Those who are at this level state the criticism without bodily attacks, damaging property, glares, insults, threats, or shouts, and with enough details so that the criticized person, if he or she wills, can improve the behavior, idea, or appearance.  If the person receiving the criticism becomes defensive or angry, these criticizers empathize without returning glares, insults, threats, or shouts.

         

       

 

 

5.  Those who are at this level provide criticism in a manner very similar to a level four style of criticism but beforehand, they consider the person who is the target of the criticism, and the situation that he or she is in.  As a result of such considerations, they may decide to alter the criticism. 

 

 

 

 

According to the Above Model, What Level of Maturity Best Describes Mr. Papelbon’s Form of Negative Criticism?

While criticizing Mr. Harper’s lack of hustle to first base, Mr. Papelbon physically attacked him. Of the five levels described in the above model, level one, the most immature level, best describes what he had done.

Why is such a style considered immature? Well, one reason is that when people respond at the more mature levels, it demonstrates that they can consider the consequences of their actions before they choose what actions to take. In this case, the consequences for Mr. Papelbon has been a suspension for the rest of the season, a fine of thousands of dollars, and he has been displayed on national news in a negative light, thus tarnishing his reputation. A little forethought would have led to avoiding these clearly negative consequences.

sprintNow, it is important to note that the specific negative criticism that Mr. Papelbon wanted to deliver to Mr. Hudson, was, according to my own value system, correct. Mr. Hudson does owe it to his teammates to hustle down to first base in these situations. However, I disagree with how Mr. Papelbon provided the criticism.

Mr. Papelbon, center, after lunging at Mr. Harper.
Mr. Papelbon, center, after lunging at Mr. Harper.

What would have been a more mature response? A little forethought would have led to realizing that Mr. Harper was very frustrated with his own pop out in the game. Thus, to wait until the next day would give both parties time to calm down.

Moreover, providing negative criticism to someone in front of lots of other people is often a huge mistake. Face-saving actions tend to increase defensiveness for both parties. Asking to discuss such matters in private is often a kinder, wiser approach.

Finally, Mr. Papelbon would have been wise to first consider if he was the best person to present the criticism. Usually managers of a team are the ones who are considered to have the legitimate authority to bring these types of issues up to a player. If Mr. Papelbon felt he had a particularly close relationship with Mr. Harper, or an established mentor relationship, there could be some exceptions to this general rule. Otherwise, Mr. Papelbon might have been wise to privately discuss his displeasure about his teammate’s lack of hustle with his manager and urge him to take firm action.

Sports Illustrated Article on “Abusive Coaches”

In big time sports, Mr. Papelbon is in no way the only one who provides negative criticism in a manner that matches the most immature levels of our model. In a special report of the September 28, 2015 issue of Sports Illustrated, Alexander Wolff (with reporting by Lauren Shute) writes:,

Coaches yelling“Why do college coaches continue to yell, demean and demoralize? That’s yesterday’s tactic. Today’s athletes can’t-and won’t-take it. What’s more, it doesn’t work: Study after study shows the benefits of a more positive approach.” (p. 51)

What are the negative consequences of providing negative criticism in these low maturity level styles? The Sports Illustrated writer tells us about excellent players leaving their teams, and in rare cases, committing suicide.

Many coaches have lost their jobs after an athletic director’s investigation. Over the past 28 months at least seven Division I schools have had an investigation, and then parted ways with coaches following player complaints of mistreatment.

Moreover, some colleges end up getting sued. In one case, seven former players have filed a $10 million civil suit that charges the school and coaches were fostering a racially hostile environment.

There is some relatively good news in the Sports Illustrated article. Apparently, most players are not being treated in a demeaning manner judging from one recent NCAA survey. Of Division I players, 31% of men’s basketball players and 22% of football players reported that a coach “puts me down in front of others.” Although this indicates that there is still plenty of room for improvement, it can nevertheless be viewed as a hopeful sign that most coaches are finding more positive ways to bring out quality performances in their players.

Why Do Many Coaches Continue to Use Abusive Tactics?

As reported in the Sports Illustrated article, according to Ramogi Huma, executive director to the National College Players Association, which often hears from abused athletes:

“I believe this is a cultural problem. A lot of coaches, they were hollered at and abused when they were players.” (p. 52)

coach yelling 2There is also undoubtedly a great deal of pressure on the coaches. If they don’t win, they are very likely to be replaced.

But perhaps the major reason is that coaches are not provided enough inspiring stories about how successful coaches find ways to win by fostering bonding, loyalty, and commitment to a team in a positive manner. Dramatic enthusiasm when explaining to players what specifically they can do to improve, rather than belittling them about what they did wrong, is one such positive approach. Celebrating each step toward improvement is another.

Conclusion

Thinking about what happens when immature styles of criticism occur in the world of big time sports can provide us an important lesson with regards to how we provide criticism to others in non-athletic situations. The five levels of maturity provides guidance not only to big time athletic teammates and their coaches, but also to the rest of us.

Real change from lower levels of maturity to higher levels rarely occurs from reading a single article. More typically, it requires bringing examples of people utilizing the higher level skills before one’s consciousness at least weekly for several months, and, on each of these occasions, an effort must be put forth to consider how these skills can be specifically applied to one’s own life. Following this blog is a no cost way to help make this happen.

I hope you join us again real soon.

My Best, Jeff

——————————-

Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on.  This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional intelligence.  To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.

Categories
Bob Dylan conflict resolution insults poverty Rich and Poor

Bob Dylan On The Rich and Poor

Bob Dylan2Have you ever noticed that some rich people like to say insulting things about the poor, and some poor people like to say some insulting things about the rich. Well, since this blog is all about insults, as well as respect, let’s see if today we can throw a little sunshine on this.

As followers of this blog know, from time to time, I enjoy selecting one of Bob Dylan’s Theme Time Radio Hour shows to help us with these kinds of endeavors. Today, we’ll be utilizing Bob’s “Rich Man, Poor Man” theme.

Bob’s Introduction

Time for Theme Time Radio Hour. This week we’re going to take a look at two different kinds of people, them that’s got, and them that needs. We’re going to talk about a dichotomy between the rich man and the poor man.

Poverty 2As soon as Bob finishes this sentence, we hear an audio clip from a movie I can’t quite put my finger on, “If you permit me to say so, sir, the subject is not an interesting one. The poor know all about poverty, and only the morbid rich would find the topic glamorous.”

Then, Bob’s voice returns.

Bob Miller
Bob Miller

Bob Miller wrote a song about both of them. He knew that poor people had something that no millionaire had–poverty. Here’s a story about a rich man and a poor man. The rich man steals a million from the bank that he controls, and the poor man steals a penny for a loaf of bread or a penny worth of rolls. One goes away laughing, while the other goes away in tears. The rich man gets an apology while the poor man gets ten years. All kinds of life lessons in this song with no crapola.

Then Bob plays Miller’s song, “The Rich Man and the Poor Man.” We get a pretty good sense of some of the resentment that poor folks feel in many societies from the opening lyrics:

resentfulThere’s just two kinds of people, the sinner and the saint;
There’s one that gets and always got while the other poor one ain’t.
Oh, the rich man drives his Lincoln past the red light with a grin,
And the poor man follows right behind in his little hunk of tin.
There’s a motorcycle copper following upon their trail;
Oh, the rich man tears his ticket, but the poor man goes to jail.

Here we get a pretty vivid sense of the resentment that can boil up within the hearts of many poor folks when they see incidents of being treated unfairly. This can lead some to start throwing around a few insults.

Bob’s Show Continues

After Bob’s introduction to his theme and his first song, he goes on to say:

That was Bob Miller, “The Rich Man and the Poor Man.” I’ve known both and there’s good in each.

Soon afterwards, Bob tells us about some people who have gone from rags to riches.

Little Richard
Little Richard

Some of the songs he subsequently plays are about the dreams some poor people have about becoming rich, including “Get Rich Quick” by Little Richard. Apparently, one day this guy he’s singing about dreams of going to the track with twenty dollars and coming home with twenty-thousand. And, of course, in his imagination, when this happens “every thing will be OK.” I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I’ve read a few biographies and have come away thinking that for people who have gone from rags to riches, pure happiness doesn’t always come by quite so easily. Still, the rocking saxophones on that song makes it well worth a listen.

Next up, Bob plays “Charming Betsy” by the Farmer’s Boys.

 

Rich girl got married in a long white veil

Poor girl would like to have a train

My girl never said I do

But she does just the same

Here, I get the sense that the song writer, while recognizing that the poor may have the desire to have what rich folks have, if you have the love of your girl, well, in some ways it’s just the same.

Soon after the Farmer’s Boys song, Bob plays us another audio clip from a movie:

povertyYou see sir, rich people think of poverty as in the negative, as the lack of riches, as a disease might be called a lack of health. But it isn’t sir. Poverty isn’t the lack of anything, but a positive plague, virulent in itself, and contagious as cholera, with filth, criminology, vice and despair as only a few of its symptoms.

Instead of Looking Down Their Noses At the Poor, The Rich Would be Wise to Remember How Easily They Too Can Become Poor

Although some of the rich may look down at the poor, Bob wisely reminds all of us that with a little twist of society’s fortunes, the rich can turn rapidly into the poor. Thus, he says:

stock market crashOn October 24th, 1929 the stock market fell. On Black Friday, many rich men turned into poor men. Suddenly many of them were on the street corners selling apples. Whether it was Black Friday or today, there are too many people out there who need to ask, Brother, can you spare a dime? Here’s Bing Crosby on Theme Time Radio Hour.

Here are some of the words from Crosby’s touching song:

Bing Crosby
Bing Crosby

They used to tell me I was building a dream
With peace and glory ahead
Why should I be standing in line
Just waiting for bread?

Once I built a railroad, I made it run
Made it race against time
Once I built a railroad, now it’s done
Brother, can you spare a dime?

Once I built a tower up to the sun
Brick and rivet and lime
Once I built a tower, now it’s done
Brother, can you spare a dime?

Say, don’t you remember? They called me ‘Al’
It was ‘Al’ all the time
Why don’t you remember? I’m your pal
Say buddy, can you spare a dime?

Shortly after the song, Bob provides us a quote from Confucius: “In a country well governed, poverty is something to be ashamed of;  in a country badly governed, wealth is something to be ashamed of.” Hmmm, I think this is Bob’s way of reminding people that sometimes the wealthy have some responsibility for working toward a well governed country that gives everyone a fair chance.

When the Wealthy Hold Down the Poor

Louis Armstrong
Louis Armstrong

When the show continues, we get to an uncomfortable situation, which Louis Armstrong emotionally captures in a song titled, “Hobo, You Can’t Ride the Train.” It tells about how the rich has put this middle class railroad brakeman in charge of making sure the hobos don’t sneak on the train. Let’s look at some of its words, sung in Armstrong’s familiar raspy voice:

Oh Hobo, hobo you know you can’t ride this train 
Now hobo now listen here hobo
I told you you can’t ride this train
You done forgot I’m the brakesman on this train boy, I’m awful tough I’m awful mad
I’m telling you (ha, ha, ha)
You gotta give me something boy oh yeah
Hobo you can’t ride this train
As I said before, hobo hobo 
You know you can’t ride this train
Ah hobo hobo you know what big boy I’ll let go
I’ll give you a break, you’re all right
Here we get a sense that the singer knows he’s getting paid to keep the hobo off the train, and he’s trying to be light about it. At one point he thinks, maybe he can get something out of the hobo, by saying, “You gotta give me something boy oh yeah.” But in the end, the singer decides to give the hobo a break.
Clark Gable
Clark Gable

In case we are too quick to think that hobos were just a bunch of rotten, no good folks who deserved to be poor, Bob tells us about a number of people who many of us have come to admire who had been hobos at various points in their lives–heavy weight champion Jack Dempsey, actor Clark Gable, singer Woody Guthrie, and writer Eugene O’Neill.

 

The next song Bob plays, Woody Guthrie’s “Do Re Mi,” is very sad. It tells the tale of folks during the great depression trying to get to California to find a way to escape desperate poverty.

Woody Guthrie
Woody Guthrie

Lots of folks back East, they say, is leavin’ home every day,
Beatin’ the hot old dusty way to the California line.
‘Cross the desert sands they roll, gettin’ out of that old dust bowl,
They think they’re goin’ to a sugar bowl, but here’s what they find 
Now, the police at the port of entry say,
“You’re number fourteen thousand for today.” 

Oh, if you ain’t got the do re mi, folks, you ain’t got the do re mi,
Why, you better go back to beautiful Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Georgia, Tennessee.
California is a garden of Eden, a paradise to live in or see;
But believe it or not, you won’t find it so hot
If you ain’t got the do re mi. 

The Perspective of the Rich

About halfway into the show, Bob say:

Bob Dylan on GuthrieWe’re talking a lot about poor people;  let’s go on the other side of the track. I like talking about the rich men a little better. They’re a little more happy go lucky. You know what’s better than a little money? A lot of money. 

Liliane Bettencourt
Liliane Bettencourt

The richest woman in America in 2005 was Liliane Bettencourt, the daughter of L’Oreal founder. She’s worth around 16 billion. That’s billion, with a “B.” Wow! That’s a lot of bazoma! Another rich woman is Betty Nesmith Graham. She invented liquid paper, and when she passed away, she left her 50 million dollar estate to her son, former Monkey, Mike Nesmith. Gives new meaning to be rich on paper.

Back to the Other Side of the Tracks

MandelaQuoteBob only spends a few minutes discussing the rich person’s experience, quickly returning us to songs like Johnny Rivers’s popular “Wrong Side of The Track” and Emmylou Harris’s lovely “Hobo Lullaby.” I would have liked him to try to get more into why so many of the rich look down on the poor, but his sympathy clearly is on those less well off.

Ben Franklin
Ben Franklin

As the show begins to close, Bob tells us, “If you are poor, I hope you get rich, and if you are rich, I hope you get happy.” Finally, he says, “I’ll leave you with the words of Benjamin Franklin, ‘He that is of the opinion that money will do anything may be suspected of doing everything for money.’ Thank you Ben. Peace out.”

And so, with those words, Bob ends his show. But before I sign off today, here’s a few parting words of my own.

Throwing insults at anyone, whether at the rich or poor, is not going to help anyone. If you experience a twinge of resentment over these types of issues, I can certainly understand that. But it is whether or not you can transform these twinges into something really positive that will determine whether you end up with just a bunch of awful feelings, or, alternatively, increase the respect you have for yourself.

Here’s one suggestion that has worked for me. When I notice this experience within myself, I find a time to sit for five minutes with my eyes closed. During these five minutes, I experience fully how this resentment is being expressed within my body. Maybe it is felt as a tightness in my chest, a wringing in the pit of my stomach, a clenching of my fist, or a crunching of my muscles around my forehead. I just fully observe these physical sensations for a full five minutes. Then I plant a seed by saying to myself, “I hope that at some point I can come up with a way to transform this experience into something useful and genuinely helpful.”

chinese-proverbAt one point, what came out of this experience is this idea that although it is certainly kind to give a hungry person a fish, in the long run it is even more kind to find ways to teach a hungry person to fish. With this in mind, I worked for many years in school systems doing my best to remove blocks that were getting in the way of students learning. And more recently, I have created this blog, “From Insults to Respect,” as a curriculum that is free to both the poor and the rich. It is designed to be a tool that can help people to learn some crucial skills for climbing the true ladder of success.

And with that, I hope you visit “From Insults to Respect” again real soon. Until then, as Bob says, “Peace out!”

——————————-

Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on. This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional and social intelligence. To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.

Categories
conflict resolution Donald Trump insults intergroup conflicts interpersonal conflicts intrapersonal conflicts Name calling politicians

The Insults of Donald Trump

When it comes to insulting people, Mr. Donald Trump is New Jersey Governor Chris Christie on steroids.

The Paradox

trump2Among Mr. Trump’s insults are calling some people “fat pigs” and “disgusting animals.” During his first presidential campaign, I observed him on national TV calling Senator Lindsey Graham “a stiff,” Governor Rick Perry “stupid,” and numerous other political opponents, “idiots.” He has denigrated federal judges who ruled against his efforts that sought to suspend refugee flows.

Chris ChristieIn an earlier post about Gov. Chris Christie’s use of insults, I described the following apparent paradox. On the one hand, there is a considerable amount of evidence that people who are very insulting tend to be less liked and respected. On the other hand, Former Gov. Chris Christie is well known to be very insulting, and despite this, he was twice elected governor of New Jersey, and at one point he was viewed as a front runner for the next U.S. presidential election. Here is a man that many people came to admire.

Now we see that Gov. Chris Christie has fallen in the respect others had had for him, while Mr. Trump has taken his place as a big time insulter who, despite his insulting ways, has gained respect from some and in 2016 received enough votes to get him elected US president. As I did when Gov. Christie was the king of insults, in today’s post I want to take this opportunity to explain this apparent paradox.

Explaining the Paradox

interpersonalintrapersonalFirst of all, the negative effects of being insulting is strongest in interpersonal and intrapersonal relationships.  As I define these terms, your interpersonal relationships are your interactions with people with whom you have direct, face to face interactions on an ongoing basis; your intrapersonal relationships involve interactions that you have with yourself.

intergroupThe relationship that politicians have with voters is best viewed as an intergroup relationship, rather than either an interpersonal or intrapersonal relationship. The intergroup relationship I’m discussing today regarding politicians involves the group of people who might potentially vote for them, the group of people who have a vested interest in getting the politician elected, and the groups of people who are working to get someone else elected.  Although insulting people is relevant to intergroup relationships, other issues often become more important.
interpersonal-conflict-violenceIn an interpersonal relationship, if you attempt to insult the person with whom you are personally interacting, that person might insult you back and the interaction can escalate into violence. In fact, the most common reason people turn to violence is because they felt someone treated them disrespectfully.

When we see politicians seeking to insult someone, they are modeling for others this type of violence producing behavior. But what makes this type of behavior very different for politicians is that they almost always have a group of supporters standing behind them and a team of armed security personnel well trained to intervene if an insulted party makes any moves at all that can be viewed as violent.  Under this set of circumstances, it is far safer to play the part of a tough guy who doesn’t take any crap. Meanwhile, as politicians like Mr. Trump model this behavior for people without the protections afforded to politicians, it can potentially increase levels of violence for non-politicians.

interpersonal conflict comicHere’s another difference between what typically happens during your interpersonal relationships and the intergroup interactions that involve politicians.  When someone directly seeks to insult you, unless you are well trained in handling this in a peaceful manner, you are likely to take the insult personally. The emotions that arise in this situation are more likely to be stronger than typically experienced when groups of people see on TV or in a large arena a politician throwing insults at someone they don’t personally know.

election-vote-ballot-boxPoliticians, moreover, are not seeking to develop a sound interpersonal relationship with you. They are, instead, seeking your vote. They know very well that not everyone is going to vote for them. If they anger the voters who aren’t likely to vote for them anyway, and end up getting 51 percent of the vote, this, to them, is success.

interpersonal conflict zNow, when it comes to interpersonal relationships, if you act in a manner that leads to even a minority not liking you, this can lead to far more direct problems for you than if a minority of people don’t vote for some politician. If those who personally know you don’t like you, they can begin to say things behind your back to people who actually personally interact with you. Some of what gets said can be untrue and very unfair, but you may never hear about this. This behind your back treatment may result in people that you like no longer inviting you to parties.  When you used to be invited to go bowling, now someone else is getting invited. In a work setting, you may be passed up for promotion. These types of consequences can have direct effects on your personal life. For Mr. Trump, the personal effects that may occur if he angers a minority of people who would have been unlikely to vote for him, would be far less important to him than getting elected.

issuesAlso, note that when people decide on who to vote for, they consider many issues, not just whether or not the candidate insults anyone.  When Mr. Trump insults someone, many voters are apt to say to themselves, he isn’t doing anything much different than all the other politicians. These voters then choose a candidate based on other issues.  If some voters recognize that Mr. Trump insults others a bit more than other candidates, they may feel that his stand on immigration is a far more important issue for them.

Others will actually like the insulting because the insults are aimed not at them, but at people whom they have come to dislike. If you have become angry because you like to use the “N-word” and people have criticized you about it, you may have become angry about what strpolitical correctikes you as political correctness. When Carl Tomanelli, a 68-year old retired New York City police officer was asked by a New York Times reporter why he is supporting Mr. Trump, he answered, “People are starting to see, I believe, that all this political correctness is garbage. I think he’s echoing what a lot of people feel and say.”

problemsOther voters are very angry at the lack of progress being made by current career politicians on solving immigration, economic, and other problems. Many of these voters’ own personal style for dealing with this anger is to throw insults at these politicians. When Mr. Trump does the same thing, these voters see him as one of them. These same individuals are apparently unable to see that if he was throwing the same types of insults at them, they would not like this. To them, it’s perfectly okay to insult people they have come to not like. If someone insults them, however, their blood would boil. It seems to me that because it is wrong for people to insult them when someone disagrees with them, it is equally wrong for them to insult others when they disagree with others.

Many like to characterize Mr. Trump’s use of insults as his way of being a tough no-nonsense kind of guy. But in my view a person can surely be a tough no-nonsense kind of guy without seeking to insult people.

dailynewstrumpWhen asked why he uses insults, Mr. Trump at times says that those whom he insults, insulted him first. It is true that he does often get insulted. Recently I’ve seen him called a “feckless blowhard,” a “jackass,” “reprehensible,” “vile,” “absurd,” “pathological lier,” a narcissist, and “shameful.” But those who insult him often say they do it because he insulted either them, or someone they personally know. And so many who are either leaders of our nation, or hope to be so, are choosing to engage in this “You Started it First” name-calling game.

It is simply not true that if someone throws an insult at you the only intelligent way to respond is to seek to insult them back. In my view, within the political arena, one way to respond in a manner that I would respect is to state firmly, “I’m not here to get into this name-calling game. I’m here to let the public know what my positions are on the problems of this nation, and how I, if elected, plan to go about fixing them.”

Yes, initially politicians can get a great deal of attention for being extra insulting. This increases name recognition, and a subgroup of people will initially admire the politician for it. But is it a lasting valuable asset? Trump yAlthough Mr. Trump won the most electoral votes in 2016, polls regularly indicated he was the most disliked candidate in history. Moreover, Mr. Trump had millions of dollars of contracts cancelled when he made a comment that many immigrants found offensive. And he lost the following election. So, perhaps his insulting behavior is not such a winning tactic as some may think.

I hope this post will help you to think twice if you think that the type of insulting behavior Mr. Trump uses is effective in your own interpersonal and intrapersonal relationships.

———————
Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on. This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional intelligence. To begin at the very first post you can click HERE

Categories
Brooklyn bullying conflict resolution insults interpersonal conflicts intrapersonal conflicts levity playful teasing

On Brooklyn Wisdom for Responding to Insults

lunchroomWhen his father lost his job because of a serious illness, John qualified for a free lunch pass at school.  The first time John showed the cashier at the school’s lunch line his pass, Fred, a husky boy standing behind John, started to laugh and cry out to others, “Hey guys, get a load of this! John has a free lunch pass. What’s the matter, John, your parents can’t afford to buy you lunch.”

lunchroom2“That will be enough of that, Fred!” scolded the cashier. At that same moment, John turned to Fred and hollered, “Shut your big mouth, you fat pig!” Both boys started swinging at each other, and it took three school officials to pull them apart. 

Insults and The Wisdom Of My Youth

Brooklyn 1When I was growing up in Brooklyn, I, along with everyone I knew, had to deal with insults, and this was not always an easy task. The entire body of wisdom that I received on how to handle these types of experiences basically amounted to a mere three sentences:

1. “If people throw an insult at you, throw an insult right back at them.”

2. “If throwing insults back at the insulter doesn’t shut them up, slug them right in the kisser, that’ll teach them to keep their big mouth shut!”

3. “You should just ignore insults.”

brooklyn 2Despite these words of advice, I found that when those that I knew and I had insults thrown at us, often a great deal of strong emotions would arise, and the way we handled these situations often left behind an uncomfortable, often bitter, state of affairs.

Difficulty Dealing With Insults Extends Far Beyond Brooklyn’s Borders

As years went by, I found that difficulty dealing with insults was not just something that occurred in Brooklyn; it was actually a problem area for many throughout the world.

UniversityAs I began to study psychology at the University of Minnesota, I found that many individuals who seek mental health services because of concerns around feelings of depression often are spending a great amount of time insulting themselves. A major reason that they do this is that they know people who are treating them disrespectfully, or when they were younger, someone had treated them in a very disrespectful manner. I also found that violent offenders typically become violent because they perceive that someone had insulted them, the situation escalated and eventually someone was seriously hurt. Now the community was paying millions of dollars to deal with the aftermath.

A Brooklyn Boy Tries to Improve On the Wisdom Of His Youth

rochesterAs I began my professional career in Rochester, New York, immediately I received referrals from teachers who wanted me to help students who were having difficulty handling insults. I quickly learned that the same three wisdom sentences that I had learned to respond to criticism when I was growing up in Brooklyn were already well known to these students, and despite this, things weren’t going at all well. And so it fell upon me to try to come up with some better ways to deal with these types of problems.

I soon found some approaches that worked rather well. Of course, I always began by making a personal connection with the student by asking what they liked to do. Usually some things that they liked were things I liked as well. Rock music, some of the talented athletes of the day, a TV program or two, would come up, and once our enthusiasm for a few topics were shared, we would get on with working on some new ways to deal with insults. Throughout this process, they would criticize me from time to time, and I sought to model the patterns of behavior I hoped these students would learn.

Illustration by Lois Hubertz
Illustration by Lois Hubertz

Before long, I would point out that everyone experiences name calling, insults, and teasing, even the greatest presidents, the most talented athletes, and rock stars.  If someone insults you, it does NOT mean that you are a bad person.

I then tell them the story of John and how Fred laughs at him on the lunch line when he uses, for the first time, his free lunch pass. Afterwards, I ask:

“Why do you think Fred laughs at John?”

The typical response is, “It’s because Fred is mean.” 

pratfalls“It may seem that way,” I reply, but think about this for a moment. Comedians have learned that if they pretend to accidentally trip and fall down, people laugh. Why do you think they laugh?”

Typical answer: “It’s just funny.”

Me: “Did you ever laugh when you saw somebody trip and fall?”

Typical answer: “Yeah.”

Me: “Because you’re mean?”

Typical answer: “No.”

Me: Well then, how come?

Typical answer: “It’s just funny.”

Me: “Sometimes it does seem to be funny. But you know why I think people laugh?”

Typical answer: “Why?”

A young man in a gray cardigan shows facepalm

Me: “I think that when people see someone trip and fall, it reminds them of when they, themselves, tripped and fell or messed up in some other embarrassing way. They remember how embarrassing it was, and it is a relief to them to see that they aren’t the only ones who sometimes mess up. It is that relief that they feel that leads to their laugh.

“In that story that I told you about John and Fred, when Fred laughs at John on the lunch line, I think it’s not because he’s being mean. It’s because he recalled that there were times when something embarrassing happened to him. Seeing John use his free lunch pass was a relief to Fred.

embarrassed2“One reason I think this is true is that people who have had the most embarrassing things happen to them are, from my experience, usually the quickest to start to laugh when something embarrassing happens to someone else.  They also laugh the loudest, and they are the quickest to tell others of the embarrassing thing that happened to someone else. Do you understand what I mean?”

With this type of discussion, students referred to me very soon get to understand that when someone laughs at you, often it isn’t really because they are being mean to you. Rather, they see that you are similar to them in that you have had to deal with some embarrassing problems, just like them.

Helping students to learn this idea, which takes several reminders in the form of several Cool Steve Stories over several counseling sessions, changes their belief that “people who laugh at me are just being mean.” As they replace that belief with this new idea, their anger is reduced. Thus, it becomes easier to teach them other skills that go way beyond the three-sentence words of wisdom that most people are being taught–skills like how to recognize when laughing at someone begins to go beyond the typical emotional relief that many of us experience when we see someone else do something embarrassing and turns into bullying; and skills like the five levels of maturity for responding to negative criticism (see here and here).

During my professional career I was getting paid to provide advice on these types of interpersonal and intrapersonal problems. Now that I’m comfortably retired, I have a calling to give back something to our communities. So, through my blog, “From Insults to Respect,” I offer, for free, the same advice I used to get paid for. It’s a labor of love.

Conclusion

lunchroomLet’s conclude today’s post by returning to a situation very similar to the one with which we began. This time, however, thirteen-year old John, had had quite a bit of practice on handling this type of situation with a wise teacher before he met Fred. Now, faced with Fred’s laughter and comment, John chooses to respond on the lunchroom line in a manner that is very different than my Brooklyn upbringing suggested was wise. Let’s take a look at how this might get played out:

Fred, a husky boy standing behind John, starts to laugh and cries out to others, “Hey guys, get a load of this! John has a free lunch pass. What’s the matter, John, your parents can’t afford to buy you lunch?”

John turns to Fred, looks squarely into Fred’s eyes, and says firmly, “You’re right, Fred, right now my parents can’t afford to buy me lunch.”

A couple of the guys laugh. John says to himself, “They’re laughing because embarrassing things happened to them. They’re feeling inside a sense of relief now that they’re seeing something embarrassing happening to someone else.”

Throughout this process, John does experience within himself some embarrassment at what is taking place. As he notices this, from time to time he says to himself, “My feelings are natural and helpful. They will help me to remember this experience, and lead me to try to figure out how I can work toward improving my current situation.

This time there is no bloody, violent fight that has to be broken up by three school personnel. And although John is not happy with his current situation, he is far more comfortable with it knowing that if he is teased about it, he has a set of skills that has the potential to enhance his reputation.

———————————
Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on. This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional intelligence. To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.