Categories
conflict resolution Depression melancholy

The Nature of Depression and Melancholy

Welcome to From Insults to Respect. Today we take an interesting look at two states of being, depression and melancholy. A central difference between the two has to do with throwing insults at ourselves; when we are depressed we spend a great deal of time doing that, in melancholy, not so much. To better understand what I mean by this, and to clarify the natural function of depression and melancholy, it will be worthwhile to first take a brief look at another state of being, sleep.

Six Similar Characteristics of Sleep, Depression, and Melancholy

As a result of our special familiarity with sleep–we experience it pretty much every single day–when I point out six of its characteristics, everyone will readily know what I’m talking about. It will then be easier to see that similar characteristics occur with the less familiar depression and melancholy experiences.

Six Characteristics of Sleep

Before we go to sleep, we experience a warning that sleep is heading our way. We refer to this warning as “feeling sleepy.”

When we get this warning, there are a few things we can do to exercise some control over when we actually fall asleep. For example, when we are sleepy while eating breakfast but have to go to work, typically we can muster our determination to put off sleep until later.

At some point, like it or not, and even with the greatest determination to stay awake, sleep will come.

Feeling sleepy can range from being a little sleepy, all the way to the point where we can barely keep our eyes open. This range of sleepiness is dependent on a special memory that stores how sleepy you are. This memory can be visualized as a bucket. If you are a little sleepy in the morning, the bucket is viewed as only slightly filled. If you manage to divert your attention from the sleepiness so you can go to work, by the time you get back home, your sleepiness memory hasn’t forgotten that the bucket was slightly filled earlier, and now that several more hours have gone by without getting some sleep, the bucket has filled up beyond the height than it was in the morning. This becomes noticeable by more frequent waves of sleepiness, and each wave feels more heavy or intense. If you divert your attention from how sleepy you are so you can have dinner and watch a few of your favorite TV shows, you will find that none of your earlier sleepiness has been completely forgotten for long, and on top of that, even more sleepiness has been added. By the time you are watching the opening monologue of the Tonight Show, your bucket may now be filled up, and sleep will come even if you try to resist.

Just like there is natural variation in the various characteristics of us humans, like how tall we are or the color of our hair, different people have various size sleepiness memory buckets. Most have average size buckets, and after about sixteen hours without sleep their bucket becomes pretty filled up and they will typically sleep for about eight hours. Other people can go with less sleep; others require more sleep.

Finally, some people, desiring to avoid having their bucket getting filled up too early, will carve out some time in their day to take a nap or two. Each nap lowers the level in their bucket, and they therefore remain more alert during the day after a few minutes of grogginess passes.

Summarizing the six sleep characteristics I want to  bring to your attention, 1. sleep has a warning sign, 2. we can delay sleep for a limited period of time, 3. despite our efforts at putting off sleep, at a certain point sleep will come, 4. we have a special memory that remembers how sleepy we are, 5. people vary on how much sleep they need, and 6. we can decrease the duration of our major sleep event by doing something we call a nap.

The Six Characteristics Of the State of Being that is Often Referred to As Depression

As Katrina is on her way to work, a concern arises within. “My job is not really right for me,” she says to herself. “It’s getting more and more boring, and the pay is barely enough to make ends meet. I have to make a change.”

Now she has arrived. She pauses and says to herself, “I’m going to put off dealing with this job concern ’cause I have to focus on my work responsibilities.”

Katrina finds that throughout her work hours, for the most part, she is able to put off thinking about this concern, though from time to time, she does notice a wave going through her reminding her of it. Each time this happens, she finds that she can cut it off quickly so she can focus on her job responsibilities.

So far in this scenario, we begin to see some similarities between sleep and the buildup of concerns that might lead to depression. That is, each wave of sleepiness is a warning sign that a person will need to get some sleep soon, and each wave of concern that Katrina is experiencing is a warning sign that she will soon have to address her job concern. We also see, in this Katrina scenario, that she can exercise some control over when she addresses her concern, putting off dealing with it until a more convenient time. Notice that this is similar to sleep in that when we feel sleepy, we still can put off going to sleep for a while.

Now, let’s continue with Katrina’s story.

After work, she meets her mother at a nice restaurant to have dinner. There, her mother reveals that she has discovered a lump in her breast.

Upon arriving home, Katrina puts on the TV to see some shows she likes. While watching, she finds that her concerns intrude into her consciousness more frequently and in a more intense manner than previous recent days. In the medical model of thinking about this, these intrusions would be viewed as symptoms of a possible mental disorder. As I view them, they are as natural as a sunrise.

Later in the week, Katrina finds out that her mother’s lump has been diagnosed as cancerous. Then the guy that Katrina has been dating and is really crazy about, calls. In as pleasant a manner as he can muster, he ends his relationship with Katrina explaining he has met someone new. Despite Katrina’s effort to stay positive, she finds she can no longer put off experiencing feelings of disappointment, despair, anguish, sadness and tears.

Like the sleep memory that we visualized as a sleepiness bucket, we can visualize the concern memory also as a bucket. As time passes for Katrina, her memory bucket remembers all of her previous unresolved concerns, and as new concerns come her way, her bucket begins to fill up more and more. As it does so, she experiences more frequent reminders of needing to deal with all of her concerns, and these reminders begin to feel heavier or more intense. Eventually, her concern memory bucket becomes filled to the top and, therefore, putting off dealing with her concerns can no longer be done.

As it did for sleep, this visual metaphor of a bucket works well for depression in two other ways. First, when we look at the various characteristics of depression, we find variation in people’s ability to put off until a more convenient time addressing their concerns. We can visualize this as having either a large, average, or small concern memory bucket. Second, like the sleep memory bucket which we can decrease its contents prior to our main sleep experience by taking naps, there are ways we can decrease the contents in our concern memory bucket before entering into a full blown episode of depression. For example, by meditating once or twice a day, this provides an opportunity to spend time addressing concerns with little distractions.

Meditation is supremely useful for this because the practice involves going to a quiet place and then closing your eyes. Although during meditation you may spend some time focussing on your mantra, this mantra task is so simple that ample time and mental space is available for your concerns to bubble up to the surface where they can be addressed while you are in a relatively calm state.

Taking a walk, or watching a sporting event like baseball also provide a lot of down time to mull over our concerns, and therefore, are examples of other ways we can work though our concerns in a manner that allows us some control over when we have to deal with a full blown depression experience. In today’s world, because there are so many opportunities to distract us from addressing our concerns, from entertaining TV shows, movies, the ease of calling friends, and engaging on social media platforms, methods that free us from so many distractions for periods of time can be enormously helpful.

A Difference Between Sleep and Depression

We have just looked at six characteristics of depression that are somewhat similar to the six characteristics of sleep that we discussed earlier in this essay. There are, of course, some differences between sleep and depression. The difference I want to point out here is that the passing of time is the main factor that leads to needing to go into a period of sleep. The longer you are awake, the sleepier you are likely to become.

When it comes to depression, time is still a factor because the more time passes, the more concerns can develop in a person’s life. Nevertheless, a much bigger factor that influences when someone enters a state of depression has to do with the nature of each concern. Some concerns are relatively easy to address, others are harder. Moreover, concerns vary with regards to how threatening they are to one’s goals.

Easy to resolve concerns are taken out of the bucket after a brief period of reflection, while difficult to resolve conflicts take up space in the bucket sometimes for years. Highly threatening concerns take up far more room in the bucket than low threatening concerns. If they are highly threatening and hard to resolve, much of one’s bucket can be almost filled to the brim for years. When this happens, for years each warning about the need to address concerns will be more intense, and it will take much less additional concerns to fill up the bucket. Thus, people who experience traumatic events are more likely to experience depression more often.

The Difference Between Depression and Melancholy

The six characteristics that apply to depression apply to melancholy as well. The chief difference between the two, as I mentioned earlier, is when people experience depression they insult themselves, whereas when people experience melancholy, not so much.

As the bucket begins to fill up, those who are prone to throw personal insults at themselves, typically choose ones that have to do with feeling guilty about becoming depressed, past mistakes, being crazy, and being worthless. The psychiatric model has them thinking they have bad genes, a lifelong pathological condition, as well as having a condition that is stigmatizing. All of this leads to the person experiencing self-loathing. The insults people attack themselves with add to the concerns in their bucket, leading to it becoming fuller more quickly than if they did not do this, and the insults are distracting, so that the real work of addressing the real concerns are less efficiently addressed.

In contrast, consider how musician and song writer Joni Mitchell described melancholy in her beautiful song, “Hijira.”

There is comfort in melancholy where there is no need to explain, it’s just as natural as the weather in this moody sky today.

In melancholy, the person practices self-compassion and views the experience as a natural helpful process.

David Whyte

David Whyte is one of the finest writers to capture the essence of the melancholy state. We get a sense of this by reading the following from his fine book, Consolations: The Solace, Nourishment, and Underlying Meaning of Everyday Words:

Disappointment is inescapable but necessary; a misunderstood mercy and when approached properly, an agency for transformation and the hidden, underground, engine of trust and generosity in a human life. The attempt to create a life devoid of disappointment is the attempt to avoid the vulnerabilities that make the conversations of life real, moving, and life-like; it is the attempt to avoid our own necessary and merciful heartbreak. To be disappointed is to reassess ourself and our inner world, and to be called to the larger foundational reality that lies beyond any false self we had only projected upon the outer world….

Despair takes us in when we have no where else to go; when we feel the heart cannot break anymore, when our world or our loved ones disappear, when we feel we cannot be loved or do not deserve to be loved, when our God disappoints, or when our body is carrying profound pain in a way that does not go away.

Despair is a haven with its own temporary form of beauty; of self-compassion, it is the invitation we accept when we want to remove ourselves from hurt. Despair is a last protection. To disappear through despair is to seek a temporary but necessary illusion, a place where we hope nothing can ever find us in the same way again.

Despair is a necessary and seasonal state of repair, a temporary healing absence, an internal physiological and psychological winter when our previous forms of participation in the world take a rest; it is a loss of horizon, it is the place we go when we do not want to be found in the same way anymore. We give up hope and certain particular wishes are no longer able to come true and despair is the time in which we both endure and heal, even when we have not yet found the new form of hope.

Melancholy provides a richer, and more powerful approach for addressing our concerns, even the most challenging ones. It doesn’t waste time with all of the insults, though, because of old habits, some may still leap into consciousness. When they do, those in melancholy can observe them without believing they are true. Rather, they recognize them as old unhelpful habits, allow themselves to experience the physical sensations that come with them, and then, when those sensations pass in their own good time, they move on to other work that needs to be done.

Transforming Depression To Melancholy

In our society, many of us learn to address our concerns using the depression pattern. How can they change that pattern so, when the bucket is full they experience, instead, melancholy?

One way that can be helpful, and won’t cost any money, is to start reading my blog, beginning with the first post (see HERE). Additionally, my three novels provide an entertaining way to learn to develop self respect (see HERE). There is a modest cost to purchasing them, but the ebook versions are very inexpensive.

Though most personal counselors are stuck in the medical model that pathologizes the experiences we discussed today, more and more are turning to an alternative approach that values enhancing self-compassion. Naturally my two favorites of these are my son, Jack Star Rubin, and his talented wife, Emily Whyte Rubin. You can learn about their services, which are available online, by clicking HERE. They rely on a variety of wisdom traditions that have demonstrated research support, and they listen deeply and compassionately as their clients’ express concerns. In this way, with the help of modeling, their clients come to adopt this way of listening deeply and compassionately as they, themselves, deal with their own concerns even when their counselor is not present.

Well, that’s my post for today. I hope you found some nourishing food for thought. Stay safe out there, and please join us again right here at From Insults to Respect.

———————————-

Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on.  This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional and social intelligence.  To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.

 

Categories
Bob Dylan conflict resolution Unemployment Work

Bob Dylan On Work

Welcome to From Insults To Respect.

These days, many are performing their jobs from home and are missing the camaraderie of their workplace. Such drastic changes in their lives, and that of their families, give us reason to reflect on what work means to us.

Given the main focus of this blog, you might wonder what work has to do with respect. Well, many people achieve a great deal of respect from the work they do, while others are humbled by finding they have had little choice but to take a job far different from what they had aspired to in earlier days. Others, having lost their job and finding themselves falling deep into poverty, may be questioning their own self respect. So, without any further ado, here’s a little meditation on this topic insightfully aided by Bob Dylan’s “work” episode from his Theme Time Radio Hour series, which we can listen to HERE.

Bob’s Show On the Theme of Work

As the show begins, we hear a lively swinging rhythm of a horn and bass mixing it up, and then, Bob welcomes his listeners,

Welcome back to Theme Time Radio Hour, and this week we’re talking about work. We’re talkin’ about golden parachutes, poison pills, golden handshakes. We’re talking about workin’ like a dog, work around the clock, workin’ 9 to 5; talking about all the workin’ stiffs who’re workin’ for a livin’, who live to work, labor intensive, doin’ odd jobs, married to their job, them employee of the month hard at work. So this week, no kidding around, no fooling, no goofing off, no hanging around the water cooler, because we’re going to get right down to it, putting in an honest day’s work, for an honest day’s pay, for our subject de jure is work and jobs. 

We’re going to start this thing off with the most famous poem by Walt Whitman, “I Hear America Singing.”

At this point Bob recites the poem, and he does a great job expressing the subtle emotion of its phrases:

I hear America singing, the varied carols I hear,
Those of mechanics, each one singing his as it should be blithe and strong,
The carpenter singing his as he measures his plank or beam,
The mason singing his as he makes ready for work, or leaves off work,
The boatman singing what belongs to him in his boat, the deckhand singing on the steamboat deck,
The shoemaker singing as he sits on his bench, the hatter singing as he stands,
The wood-cutter’s song, the ploughboy’s on his way in the morning, or at noon intermission or at sundown,
The delicious singing of the mother, or of the young wife at work, or of the girl sewing or washing,
Each singing what belongs to him or her and to none else,
The day what belongs to the day—at night the party of young fellows, robust, friendly,
Singing with open mouths their strong melodious songs.

Man, that Walt Whitman sure has an uplifting spirit.

Not all of Bob’s show relates to work in such a positive manner. For example, a little later Bob tells us,


We talked about Mondays before, and a lot of people don’t like them. Some like to call it blue Monday. 
T-Bone Walker called it stormy Monday. It’s the day you have to go back to the grind. 

Imagine how bad it would be if you had one of the least popular jobs in the world. The least popular jobs are poultry processor, machine operator, farm worker, laundry worker, roofer, recycling plant worker, and street prostitute. Which is worse, street prostitute or poultry processor?  Well, anyway, both of them probably hate Monday, so here’s their national anthem, “Stormy Monday,” by T-Bone Walker.
Some of the lyrics go like this:

They call it stormy Monday, and, baby, Tuesday’s just as bad
Call it stormy Monday, and, baby, Tuesday’s just as bad
Wednesday’s worse, Thursday’s oh so sad. 
The eagle flies on Friday, and Saturday I go out to play
Well the eagle flies on Friday, and Saturday I go out to play
Sunday I go to church, I kneel down and pray
Lord, have mercy, oh well it’s Lord have mercy on me
Lord, have mercy, oh well my heart’s in misery

Wow, the languid interaction between the piano, horns, and guitar on that one blows me away.

Interesting thing about me is that often when I had a Monday to Friday job, I actually liked what I did during the work week, and yet I still super looked forward to Friday. It chiefly had to do with the freedom of being able to sleep in, and when I got up, I often could do what I wanted when I wanted. As far as I’m concerned, whoever came up with the idea of jobs that let you have a whole weekend off deserves a special place in this old heart of mine. The years I had to work seven days a week, and several nights as well, adds to my special appreciation of weekends.

Next up on the show, Bob has a guy explain to us why people work:


Why does everybody have a career doing some kind of work? People work because they enjoy doing some things that are useful, and to buy the things they need for themselves and their families.
From here we drift into Merle Haggard’s song, “Workin’ Man’s Blues.” A few of the relatable lyrics are,

I keep my nose on the grindstone, I work hard every day

I might get a little tired on the weekend, after I draw my pay
Then I’ll go back workin’, come Monday morning I’m right back with the crew
I’ll drink a little beer that evening
Sing a little bit of these working man blues

Sometimes I think about leaving, do a little bummin’ around

I want to throw my bills out the window catch a train to another town
I’ll go back working, I gotta buy my kids a brand new pair of shoes
I drink a little beer in a tavern
Cry a little bit of these working man blues, here comes that workin’ man blues
I like Bob’s reaction to the song:

You know, the working man is not the only man to have the blues; it’s also often tough to be the boss. It’s like what Robert Frost once said, “By working faithfully for eight hours a day, we may eventually get to be the boss and work twelve.” 
Bob then tells us that if he had to have a boss, he would choose Bruce Springsteen.
When Bob said this, I first thought, well he hasn’t had to deal with any boss in years being the star of all of his performances. But then I thought about a great song of his, “Gotta Serve Somebody.” Take a look at a few of its lyrics:

You may be an ambassador to England or France

You may like to gamble, you might like to dance
You may be the heavyweight champion of the world
You may be a socialite with a long string of pearls
But you’re gonna have to serve somebody, yes
Indeed you’re gonna have to serve somebody
Well, it may be the devil or it may be the Lord
But you’re gonna have to serve somebody

You might be a rock ‘n’ roll addict prancing on the stage

You might have drugs at your command, women in a cage
You may be a business man or some high-degree thief
They may call you doctor or they may call you chief
But you’re gonna have to serve somebody, yes you are

It seems to me there is a whole pile of wisdom packed into that song.

As the show moves further along, Bob tells us, “Hopefully, if you want a job, you can find a job,” and then plays for us Lee Dorsey’s “Gotta Find a Job.”A lot of folks these days can sure relate to this one. Here are a few of the lyrics:


I got to get out and find a job

The roof is leaking and the rent ain’t paid
Got to get a new pair of shoes and I’m all upset
Old lady fussing bout the bills she make
I got to get out and find a job

Never made enough to put nothing on the side

Problems, problems lordy I’m so tired
Trouble by the dozen oh me, oh my
I got to get me out and find a job

I don’t know how I’m a gonna live

Something got to break lord, something got to give
I’m in trouble and I’m sincere
I got to get me out and find a job

Unemployment days with no job to be found, a heck of a job to keep one’s spirits up.

Continuing with the issue of looking for a job, Bob reads us some strange “want ads” promising us that they are all true.


Man wanted to work in a dynamite factory. Must be willing to travel.

It takes many ingredients to make Burger King great, but our most important ingredient is our people. 

A pair of hardly used dentures, two teeth missing, $100 or best offer, call Ira after 6 PM.
From here, Bob plays us the delightful version of “Whistle While You Work,” from the magnificent animated movie, Snow White.

Just whistle while you work
And cheerfully together we can tidy up the place
So hum a merry tune
It won’t take long when there’s a song to help you set the pace
And as you sweep the room
Imagine that the broom
Is someone that you love and soon you’ll find you’re dancing to the tune
When hearts are high the time will fly so whistle while you work 
The song captures the notion that perhaps even when we have work to do that strikes us as drudgery, perhaps we can adopt an attitude that will turn it into fun.
As the show begins to move toward its conclusion, Bob offers some tips about going on job interviews:

You want to keep in mind that you are going on an interview, not a date. Don’t drown yourself with perfume or 
cologne. Speak up. Interviewers don’t want to drag words out of you. On the other hand, don’t talk too much, you don’t want to bore them. Stay focused, listen to what the question is and answer it; they don’t want to hear about what your dog did last week. Make eye contact, you don’t want to appear to be some kind of criminal. Poor language skills don’t help. Using “like” every third word or repeatedly saying “um” does not make you a likely candidate. Build trust. Don’t use a lot of little white lies, you’re going to get caught, and then how are they to believe anything you say. Wear a clean shirt, and present the best you possible. And once you get the job, you can do what everyone else does, figure out ways to get the day off.  
Well, there is far more to this topic, but it’s time for me to knock off. Until next time, stay well, and let’s keep hope alive that the current work climate will soon drift into more pleasant days.

———————————————-

Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on.  This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional intelligence.  To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.

 

 

Categories
baseball conflict resolution respect

Learning About Respect Through Baseball

Welcome to From Insults To Respect. 

My last post, Baseball and Respect, aimed to provide keen insights about the nature of respect, insights that are relevant way beyond the world of baseball. To this end, we looked at the reasons some players and fans have given for singling out ballplayers they particularly respect.

As I was getting ready to finish that post, I felt frustrated because I had wanted to include three additional sections, one on Derek Jeter, one on how a new player is welcomed to a team, and one about a couple of notable baseball managers, John McGraw and Connie Mack. Nevertheless, I ended that post when I did because to include all of this would have made it way too long. So, today, let us resume our quest to deepen our understanding of the nature of respect via peering out at the wonderful world of baseball.

Derek Jeter

Besides having a Hall of Fame career, “The Captain” managed, on and off the field, to foster an exceptional degree of respect. Wonderfully capturing this sentiment is a YouTube video in which we see Jeter stepping into the batter’s box while the voice of the Yankees, Bob Sheppard, is announcing, “Now batting for the Yankees, number two, Derek Jeter, number two.” Then we see people from all walks of life, baseball players, a coach, various fans, a guy selling peanuts, police officers, fire fighters, a door man, etc., tipping their hat as a show of respect. What attributes did Jeter possess that makes these heartfelt displays credible? Grace under pressure, hard working, played hard, hustled every moment, and led by example, are regularly mentioned.

In New York City, where an army of reporters relentlessly seek to uncover some scandal to ignite their readership, Jeter managed to stay under their radar, and all that they were left with was regularly describing a hell of a class act. No fights, no steroids, no legal troubles, no distractions from what he was intent on doing–helping his team to be outstanding.

Off the field, Jeter founded the Turn 2 Foundation, a charity that motivates young people to “turn away from drugs and alcohol and ‘Turn 2’ healthy lifestyles.”

In interviews, even though he had plenty to brag about, and even when he had just won a big game with a clutch hit, Jeter remained humble while directing credit to his teammates.

Jeter often mentions that he hates to lose. Some people might take this to mean that he is a poor loser, but a poor loser is someone who becomes furious at teammates, blaming and insulting them for the loss. This was not at all Jeter’s style. Rather, his “hate to lose” attitude propelled him to strive to do his absolute best every minute of a game, and through his example, he led his fellow teammates to do the same. When discussing a disappointing loss, rather than putting down anyone, Jeter would express admiration for those on the other team who played hard to achieve their victory. That’s class!

One thing that I particularly admired about Jeter was that although he so passionately wanted to win, this desire was not expressed by hating his rivals. We saw this being expressed each time he would get a hit, for he had a delightful way of engaging in some friendly exchange with the player trying to hold him close to the base so he wouldn’t steal. Jeter’s ready smile during these interactions, even in the midst of a crucially important game, endeared him to players throughout the major leagues.

Of course, Jeter is not a perfect individual. Nobody is. As an example of what many thought a serious mistake in judgment, when Jeter assumed leadership of the Miami Marlins baseball team, he naturally wanted to bring in his own assistants. This meant he had to fire those who had been in those positions before he arrived. Rather than personally calling all of these individuals to explain why he was letting them go, he had one of his underlings do most of the dirty work. The press picked up the story, and hopefully Jeter, and the rest of us as well, learn something from this.

Not everyone is going to have the degree of talent in his or her chosen way to earn a living as Derek Jeter. Nevertheless, Jeter is an enduring inspiration to all seeking to earn respect by engaging in a variety of simple acts that pretty much all of us are well capable of doing on a day to day basis.

As a Yankee for twenty years, Jeter had ample opportunities to welcome new players joining the team. Not being a Yankee player myself, I can’t speak to how he handled this. But one thing that I do know, how it is handled can go a long way toward earning a significant degree of respect from the new guy, as we will now see.

How New Players are Treated

It’s no secret that ballplayers in the past often gave a hard time to a new player joining their team. In recent years, the major leagues developed a policy seeking to end this practice of hazing.

Some viewed the hazing as all in good fun, but at times there were really some underlying anger that was being disguised as playful teasing, and things got pretty rough. The anger typically came from the very real possibility that every time a new player shows up, another player on the team may be out of a job. If shortstop Bob has been having an extended slump, and a new shortstop comes on board, Bob does have something to worry about, and all of the other players who have come to like Bob may become concerned about losing a dear friend.

On occasion, some players handled these dynamics in a manner to be admired. In Lawrence Ritter’s fine book, The Glory of Their Times: The Story of Early Baseball Told by the Men who Played it, we see repeated examples of what I am referring to.

Jimmy Austin

Jimmy Austin played third base, arriving in 1909 with the Yankees, who were then called the New York Highlanders. Here’s his description of how he was treated:

You know, you hear all that stuff about the old-timers being so rough on rookies in those days. Well, you can’t prove it with me. Those guys were swell to me.

Wee Willie Keeler was still a pretty decent ballplayer, even then…. Wonderful fellow. I was too shy to say anything to him, but he came over to me one day and said, “Jim, you’ve got a great career ahead of you. If I can help you in any way, you just say the word.” How about that? 

And Kid Elberfeld. Golly, I was out after the Kid’s third base job, but he always treated me fine.

Jimmy went on from there to tell how the Kid would stick up for him when the club secretary tried to treat him unfairly.

In Ritter’s book, we discover time after time ballplayers recalling incidences of kindness that a veteran bestowed on them when they first joined a team, incidences recalled more than forty years afterwards. When we try to identify attributes that foster respect, I think these stories reveal a lasting truth.

What About Respect and Baseball Managers?

We have been looking at the attributes of baseball players that other players and their fans have come to respect. Baseball field managers are a special subgroup of these ballplayers. Typically, they played professionally for many years, demonstrating keen knowledge of the game, and upon reaching an age at which they are too old to continue playing at a professional level, they are singled out by club owners and their upper management team as having leadership abilities. Here, we will take a quick look at two of these guys, John McGraw and Connie Mack, not because they were perfect human beings that never made a mistake, but because a few of their attributes are particularly informative when we want to get insights about the nature of respect.

John McGraw 

Rube Marquard loved playing for the New York Giants. When asked why, he responded;

Take Mr. McGraw. What a great man he was! The finest and grandest man I ever met. He loved his players and his players loved him. Of course, he wouldn’t stand for any nonsense. You had to live up to the rules and regulations of the New York Giants, and when he laid down the law you’d better abide by it.

Fred Snodgrass also played for McGraw, and he pointed out some aspect of his leadership that he respected:

He’d never got on you for a mechanical mistake, a fielding error or failure to get a hit. He was a very fair man, and it was only when you really had it coming to you that you got it. And once he’d bawl you out good and proper, then he’d forget it. He wouldn’t ever mention it again, and in public he would always stand up for his players.

An example of something McGraw wouldn’t tolerate is not showing up for practice. Thus, there was a talented player named Bugs Raymond who wouldn’t show up at times because he had too much to drink. McGraw tried a few things to see if he could get Bugs to straighten himself out, like paying to bring his wife and children along with the team, both at home and on the road, but finally McGraw had enough and fired him.

Another attribute that Snodgrass appreciated about McGraw was his willingness to let players make decisions on their own initiative.

[A lot of people] think that John McGraw directed every move we made on the field, that he was an absolute dictator who told us when to do this and when to do that, down to the last detail. Well that’s not so…. McGraw allowed initiative to his men…. 

Of course, McGraw took charge sometimes. At certain points in a game he’d give instructions. But most of the time, as I say, the initiative was ours. 

Chief Myers was a catcher for the Giants. What did he appreciate about McGraw? Before playing for McGraw, he and the other players were always booked at the cheapest hotels.

McGraw was the one who changed all that. He was the one who paid the price, and even more than the price, to get his ball team into the best hotels.

Here’s another attribute Myers respected about McGraw;

The reason Mcgraw was a great manager–and he was the greatest–was because he knew how to handle men. Some players he rode, and others he didn’t. He got the most out of each man…. One manager knows about as much about the fundamentals of baseball as another. What makes the difference is knowing each player and how to handle him. And at that sort of thing nobody came close to McGraw.

Connie Mack

In addition to McGraw, we find in Ritter’s book players repeatedly voicing high respect for Connie Mack.

After playing for eleven years in the major leagues as a catcher, Mack became a manager, first in the minor leagues, and then, for 50 years with the Philadelphia Athletics. To have that kind of longevity as a manager, he must have done at least some things right. Here’s one of them, according to pitcher Stanley Coveleski:

Connie was a good manager. He was a very considerate man. If you did something wrong, he’d never bawl you out on the bench, or in the clubhouse. In the evening he’d ask you to take a walk with him, and on the way he’d tell you what you done wrong.

Another pitcher for the Athletics, Rube Bressler, describe Mr. Mack, this way:

In my opinion, Connie Mack did more for baseball than any other human being–by the example he set, his attitude, the way he handled himself and his players. You know, like you’re playing a great game and you’re heroes to the children of this country. Live up to it, conduct yourself accordingly. Over a period of years others followed, and baseball became respectable. He was a true gentleman, in every sense of the word. Not many men are.

Mr. Mack strove to have his players become better people as well as better baseball players, and to that end he created a Code of Conduct following the 1916 season:

  • I will always play the game to the best of my ability.
  • I will always play to win, but if I lose, I will not look for an excuse to detract from my opponent’s victory.
  • I will never take an unfair advantage in order to win.
  • I will always abide by the rules of the game—on the diamond as well as in my daily life.
  • I will always conduct myself as a true sportsman—on and off the playing field.
  • I will always strive for the good of the entire team rather than for my own glory.
  • I will never gloat in victory or pity myself in defeat.
  • I will do my utmost to keep myself clean—physically, mentally, and morally.
  • I will always judge a teammate or an opponent as an individual and never on the basis of race or religion.

Pretty decent aspirations for all.

Conclusion

There is an old humorous quip that goes, “If you want a guy to respect you, all you have to do is agree with everything he tells you.” Well, there is just enough truth in this quip to make us smile. However, to more deeply understand the nature of respect, we can do better by looking at examples of individuals who have displayed attributes that led to the admiration of those who got to know them. Above, we looked at several such examples. I hope you found it insightful.

My Best
Jeff

——————————-

Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on. This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional intelligence. To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.

Categories
baseball conflict resolution respect respecting baseball

Baseball and Respect

Welcome to From Insults to Respect.

The game of baseball offers us a unique look at the nature of respect for two reasons. First, the game provides several unusually objective statistics that give us a pretty good idea of the talent of a player. In many other fields, such as art or teaching, the criteria for talent is far less objective. Second, we find that despite this unusually objective talent criteria of baseball, when we take a look at two players that played the same position in the same era and have excellent statistics, sometimes we discover they have very different levels of respect given to them by the players’ peers and baseball fans. When we see such differences, by looking at the reasons players and fans give for this, we get particularly keen insights about the nature of respect, insights that can be applied not only to the green fields of baseball, but to other fields as well.

The Classic Example

Students of the game of baseball know that outfielders Ty Cobb and Babe Ruth were among the all time most talented players and yet the respect afforded to each can not be more different. In Lawrence S. Ritter’s wonderful book, The Glory of Their Times: The Story of the Early Days of Baseball Told by the Men Who Played It, we get a sense of why this is. So, for instance, Davy Jones played on the same team as Cobb. Here’s what he had to say:

Cobb was a very complex person–never did have many friends. Trouble was he had such a rotten disposition that it was damn hard to be his friend. I was probably the best friend he had on the club. I used to stick up for him, sit and talk with him on long trips, try to understand the man. He antagonized so many people that hardly anyone would speak to him, even among his own teammates.

Ty didn’t have a sense of humor, see. Especially, he could never laugh at himself. Consequently, he took a lot of things the wrong way. What would usually be an innocent-enough wisecrack would become cause for a fist fight if Ty was involved. It was too bad. He was one of the greatest players who ever lived, and yet he had so few friends. I always felt sorry for him.

In many ways he was resented by a lot of players because he was so doggone good, and that plus being ignored because he had such a nasty disposition meant that the man was very lonely. Of course, he brought a lot of it on himself, no doubt about that. A lot of time it seemed as though he was just asking for trouble.

Like one time in Detroit, when Cobb was in a batting slump. When Cobb was in a batting slump you couldn’t talk to him. He’d be meaner than the devil.

Davy Jones was not alone in his evaluation of Cobb. To take another example of this, teammate Sam Crawford described Cobb as follows:

Cobb was a great ballplayer, no doubt about it. But he sure wasn’t easy to get along with. He wasn’t a friendly, good natured guy, like Wagner was, or Walter Johnson, or Babe Ruth…. He came up with an antagonistic attitude, which in his mind, turned any little razzing into a life-or-death struggle.  

Now compare this description of Cobb, with how third baseman, Jimmy Austen, described Babe Ruth:

The Babe was always friendly, a real nice guy who’d go out of his way any time to do you a favor. When Cobb was out there on that ball field, look out. He wasn’t anybody’s friend then. He was out to win, regardless….

Now Babe Ruth, he was different. What a warmhearted, generous soul he was. Always friendly, always time for a laugh or a wisecrack. The Babe always had a twinkle in his eye, and when he’d hit a homer against us he’d never trot past third without giving me a wink.

The Babe would give you the shirt off his back. All you had to do was ask. The big fellow wasn’t perfect. Everybody knows that. But the guy had a heart. He really did. A heart as big as a watermelon, and made out of pure gold.

Remarkable differences in levels of respect for ball players are observed not only by their peers, but by their fans as well.

The Perspective of Fans

Mike Gilmartin’s perspective.

I have several friends who are huge baseball fans, and as I began to think about writing this post, I decided to confer with them. Mike is from duh Bronx, so naturally he is a huge Yankees fan. When I asked him about this topic he wrote me an email that said in part:

Been thinking hard about the respect/baseball thing. There are several layers here:

1.Respect for the player.
2.Respect for the person who is the player.
3.Respect for the game.

Respect for the player, I think, has to do with what you personally have witnessed via countless games watched or listened to, accounts of his performance via reputable sources (books by baseball historians, interviews with peers, historical metrics). I would largely discount authorized biographies.

Respect for the person, I think, is very difficult to assess since few fans know the player as a person. There are countless examples of superb players who are rotten human beings. Several are in the Hall of Fame, ex. Ty Cobb. There are also examples of superb players who were also superb human beings. Several are in the Hall of Fame, ex. Lou Gehrig. Most players of all levels of ability are unknowable as human beings to fans.

Respect for the game, I think, depends largely on one’s definition of “how the game should be played.”  For some, that is linked to sportsmanship. For others, that is linked to the bottom line of winning (I’m talking about pros here.) The recent Houston Astros scandal [involving using electronic devices to steal a catcher’s signals to his pitcher and relaying it to the batter] for example, was not valuing sportsmanship, but was valuing winning. Respect for the game is about behavior and that’s what is so tricky. Throwing a spitter, stealing signs, pitching high and tight, scuffing a baseball, juicing a bat, showing up an opponent, taking out a middle infielder or catcher, running up the score, bunting when far ahead, sliding with spikes up, hustling, showboating: some are time-honored acts, others are against the rules (written and unwritten) of the game.  Some were, to complicate things, within the rules at one time and are not within the rules now.

It has been said that hitting a round ball square with a rounded bat is the hardest thing to do in sports. It has also been said that pro baseball is a hard game played by hard men. Most fans idealize the game and its players and collectively have created a mythology about it. Most players are doing every thing they can to earn a living and have no illusions about being part of a mythology. That is a real disconnect, wouldn’t you say?

This is a fine overview of the issues. As far as the disconnect that Mike mentions, I think that whereas there is some truth in what he says, nevertheless there does exist a mythology in many a major leaguer’s dreams. These players, as they were growing up, had their own special baseball heroes, and many thrive to respect this sense of greatness as they go about their lives.

Interestingly, Mike once had one of his poems published in ELYSIAN FIELDS: THE BASEBALL REVIEW, 1994. It poetically asks how fans feel about the incredibly talented player, Pete Rose, after he was banned from baseball for betting on games and lying about it. Mike used E. E. Cummings’s “Buffalo Bill” poem as the template for his poem, with its unusual combining of words:

e.e.cummings/pete rose goings

Pete Rose’s
defunct
who used to
wield a whipcrack-black
bat
and tattoo onetwothreefourfive hitsjustlikethat.
Jesus
he was a great ballplayer
and what i want to know is
how do you like your barrelchested boy now
Mister Fan?

No question Pete was talented, but did he end up being respected? I’ve run into some fans that still respect him to some degree, but most agree their esteem took a nosedive after they heard about the gambling incident.

Lennon Rubin’s Perspective

When I asked my son, Lennon, what he thought about this subject, he replied:

I’ve always respected Mariano Rivera. He was the best ever at a position but always seemed so humble and down to earth. And even though he made millions of dollars, he moved back to Panama to be a preacher after he retired.  It’s not at all the life path I would have chosen, but as far as I can tell, he avoided all the pitfalls of fame and fortune, and I respect anybody who can handle that situation with class and not be pulled in by all the peer pressure and expectations attached to that.  

Lennon’s not alone when it comes to having an enormous esteem for Mariano. The stellar reliever became the first player unanimously elected into Baseball’s Hall of Fame.

Bill Vincent’s Perspective

My friend, Bill, grew up in Danville, PA, and became a huge Phillies fan. When I asked him which player he came to respect most of all, he quickly mentioned the Phillies’ Hall of Fame pitcher, Robin Roberts. As I discussed with Bill his reasons for this choice, he explained,

When I was growing up, the Phillies were arguably the worst team in the major leagues. After so many years rooting for a team that would lose so, so many games, suddenly Roberts appeared on the scene, along with the other young “Whiz Kids” and it was such a thrill to suddenly have a competitive team.

Roberts was respected on and off the field of play. He was incredibly smart and a great storyteller with a great memory and an eye for details. Stan Musial said of Roberts: “he is one of the most respected senior citizens in the game and serves on the board of directors for both the Baseball Hall of Fame and the Baseball Assistance Team which seeks to help former players experiencing financial difficulty.”

Dave Lesser’s Perspective

Dave is a friend of mine who grew up in Queens and naturally became a Mets fan. However, now that he has been living in Georgetown, he has been rooting for the Nationals.

When I asked Dave about this topic, like Mike Gilmartin, he was quick to point out the importance of drawing a distinction between respect for the player’s skills and respect for the player’s character. Expanding on this topic, he said,

To a large extent we seem to equate the two, assuming that a talented, handsome ballplayer with a winning smile must be a great guy. That, we know, is often not true, as baseball players are at least as likely as the general population to have character flaws.
Early Photo of Reporters at a New York Giants Game

In the old days of baseball, reporters were much more loyal and beholden to the ball club, and therefore less likely to write unflattering stories about a player’s off the field behavior. So it wasn’t until after a player retired that we learned about their true character. Today we know more—but not everything—about a player’s character, as those subjects are no longer off limits.

Hall of Famer Roberto Clemente is Dave’s choice for all time most respected baseball player. Dave mentioned Roberto’s incredible athleticism and his devotion to helping people living in dire circumstances. For those not familiar with Roberto’s charitable efforts, here’s some of the story according to Wikipedia:

Clemente spent much of his time during the off-season involved in charity work. When Managua, the capital city of Nicaragua, was affected by a massive earthquake on December 23, 1972, Clemente (who visited Managua three weeks before the quake) immediately set to work arranging emergency relief flights.[65] He soon learned, however, that the aid packages on the first three flights had been diverted by corrupt officials of the Somoza government, never reaching victims of the quake.[66] He decided to accompany the fourth relief flight, hoping that his presence would ensure that the aid would be delivered to the survivors.[67] The airplane he chartered for a New Year’s Eve flight, a Douglas DC-7 cargo plane, had a history of mechanical problems and an insufficient number of flight personnel (missing both a flight engineer and copilot), and was overloaded by 4,200 pounds.[68] It crashed into the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Isla Verde, Puerto Rico immediately after takeoff on December 31, 1972 due to engine failure.[69] …. The bodies of Clemente and three others who were also on the four-engine plane were never recovered.

Clemente was posthumously presented the three most prestigious US civilian awards, The Roberto Clemente Walker Congressional Gold Medal, The Presidential Medal of Freedom, and The Presidential Citizens Medal. The citation for this last award reads:

All who saw Roberto Clemente in action, whether on the diamond or on the front lines of charitable endeavor, are richer for the experience. He stands with the handful of men whose brilliance has transformed the game of baseball into a showcase of skill and spirit, giving universal delight and inspiration. More than that, his selfless dedication to helping those with two strikes against them in life has blessed thousands and set an example for millions. As long as athletes and humanitarians are honored, Roberto Clemente’s memory will live; as long as Citizens Medals are presented, each will mean a little more because the first one went to him.

Mighty fine praise for a heck of a fellow.

Oh, oh! Yipes! I’ve run out of time and yet I wanted to say something about Derek Jeter and a couple of team managers. Moreover, today’s topic requires a summary section that pulls together all of the various characteristics of people in baseball who are well recognized as being particularly deserving of respect. Oh well, I guess I’ll just have to include all of this in my next post. Until then, I’d love to hear from all of you about the qualities you look for when determining your degree of respect for players.

Thanks for stopping by,
Jeff

——————–
Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on. This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional and social intelligence. To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.

Categories
baseball conflict resolution

Bob Dylan On Baseball

Welcome to From Insults To Respect.

The Baseball season is in high gear, so let’s listen to one of its greatest fans, Bob Dylan.

Listening to Bob’s Baseball Show

It begins with a few brief notes from an organ you might hear at a ball park. Then we hear a crowd apparently getting stirred up just as a game is about to get underway. And then we hear Bob welcoming us, and introducing this show’s theme:

Tonight we’re going to head out to the fields of dreams, schemes and themes, the ever widening diamond, to take a look at the national past time, baseball.

Bob then begins to recite a poem:

Nelly Kelly loved baseball games,
Knew the players, knew all their names,
You could see her there ev’ry day,
Shout “Hurray!” when they’d play.
Her boy friend by the name of Joe
Said, “To Coney Isle, dear, let’s go,”
Then Nelly started to fret and pout,
And to him I heard her shout.

Here, Bob begins to sing the poem’s next stanza, and to my surprise it turns out that this poem contains the original lyrics of a song that all fans are thoroughly familiar with–“Take Me Out to the Ball Game.”

“Take me out to the ball game,
Take me out with the crowd.
Buy me some peanuts and cracker jack,
I don’t care if I never get back,
Let me root, root, root for the home team,
If they don’t win it’s a shame.
For it’s one, two, three strikes, you’re out,
At the old ball game.”

After singing this verse, Bob continues reciting the poem:

Nelly Kelly was sure some fan,
She would root just like any man,
Told the umpire he was wrong,
All along, good and strong.
When the score was just two to two,
Nelly Kelly knew what to do,
Just to cheer up the boys she knew,
She made the gang sing this song. 

At this point, Bob plays us a version of “Take Me Out to the Ball Game” by some artist, but doesn’t reveal who it is. Although it has the same lyrics with which we fans are all so familiar, the singer employs an entirely unique melody.

Next, Bob sends up to bat the swinging Mable Scott doing “Baseball Boogy.”

Do you, baby, know what it’s all about,
Get that bat baby,
You can hit a home run!
And when I wind up,

I’m pitching my all to you
So get your bat ready
And let’s see what you can do.

Man, that Mable can sure belt one right outta the park!

Next, Bob steps up to the plate and tells us,

In the 50’s, every red blooded American boy wanted either to play baseball or be Elvis Presley. Here’s a Rockabilly song by Chance Halladay that combines both.

The lyrics on this one are pretty wild. Here’s a little taste:

Grand slam,
Yes Ma’am

A clean sweep off of your feet.
A home run
Oh Honey Bun,
A smack on your lips.
Honey babe,
Come on, let’s cross home plate!

At one point, Bob tells us about a conversation he had with a famous actor.

I caught up with Charlie Sheen at a car wash. He’s a big baseball fan and he has a lot of opinions about the game.

Bob then plays us a recording of what Charlie had to say:

Baseball, to me, represents life. It’s about heroes and goats, it’s about success and failure. It’s about individual effort, it’s about team effort. Baseball is about the game within the game. It’s really the only game that is not governed by time. And the thing that makes me insane is the people who say baseball is boring. It’s just playing catch. They don’t understand the game within the game. They don’t understand that how much changes from pitch to pitch. It’s actually fractions of a second that a hitter has to make a decision that he is actually going to swing, and then put it either between guys or hit it over the fence.

From there, Bob plays us a little audio clip of an announcer calling the thrilling, yet poignant, moment when Ted Williams, at his last at bat of his career, hits a long home run. The reaction of the crowd is just heartwarming.

As the show goes on, we get to hear a powerful poem about how the sport celebrates the American dream, with Latin, Black, and White players joining together to thrill a San Francisco Giants crowd. Some of the lines have a distinct edge to them, a kinda kick in the pants to the time when the major leagues were a whites only affair. Here’s a little of what I mean:

And Juan Marichal comes up,
and the Chicano bleachers go loco again,
as Juan belts the first ball out of sight,
and rounds first and keeps going
and rounds second and rounds third,
and keeps going and hits paydirt
to the roars of the grungy populace.
As some nut presses the backstage panic button
for the tape-recorded National Anthem again,
to save the situation. But it don’t stop nobody this time,
in their revolution round the loaded white bases,
in this last of the great Anglo-Saxon epics,
in the territorio libre of Baseball.

Soon, we get a little sliver of the great Abbott and Costello “Who’s on first, What’s on Second” routine. And of course, there are tribute songs to Jackie Robinson and Joltin’ Joe DiMaggio. One of these have lyrics written by Woody Guthrie. Here’s Bob setting up the song:

Here’s another song about Joltin Joe, done by Billy Brag and Wilco, where they take the unfinished lyrics of Woody Guthrie and add music to them. Woody Guthrie of course was the American folk artist that at the time of his death in 19 and 67, Guthrie left behind 2500 songs, the lyrics about New York streets, film star idols, drinking, dying, and even spaceships for providing a completely different aspect of Woody’s public persona. Here’s a song that Woody wrote about Joe, the Yankee Clipper.

A few of the lyric are:

Joe with wife, Marilyn Monroe

Up along the clouds where the eagles roam
Joe cracked that ball to whine and moan
His buddies all laugh as they trot on in
Joe DiMaggio’s done it again! 

One of my favorite songs in Bob’s collection of baseball songs is The Treniers swinging version of “Say Hey,” which is about the magnificent Willie Mays. Part of the fun of it is that it actually has the participation of the Say Hey Kid himself.

Say hey, say who?
Say Willie,

He runs the bases like a choo-choo train
Swings around second like an aeroplane
His cap flies off when he passes third
And he heads home like an eagle bird.
Say hey, say who?
Say Willie
Say hey, say who?
Swinging at the plate
Say hey, say who?
Say Willie
That Giants kid is great
At one point Bob says:

Let’s check out the email basket. I hope they don’t throw us a curve.

Today’s email is from Jamie Vincent from Las Vegas, Nevada. She writes, Dear Theme Time, I enjoy listening to baseball games late at night, but my parents say the radio keeps them up. What should I do?

Jamie, you should do what I used to do. When I was supposed to be asleep, I would take my radio and slip it under my pillow. Then put your ear next to the pillow, which you’re supposed to do with pillows anyway. This way you can hear the second game of a double header without bothering anyone else in the house. Thanks for your email, your private pillow pal.

As the show begins to wind down,  Bob plays us “Heart” from the Damn Yankees musical. Man, if that song doesn’t lift your spirits, I don’t know what will:

Listen, guys, this game is only half skill,
the other half, well you gotta have heart.
You’ve gotta have heart

All you really need is heart
When the odds are sayin’ you’ll never win
That’s when the grin should start
You’ve gotta have hope

Mustn’t sit around and mope
Nothin’s half as bad as it may appear
Wait’ll next year and hope
When your luck is battin’ zero
Get your chin up off the floor
Mister, you can be a hero
You can open any door, there’s nothin’ to it but to do it
You’ve gotta have heart
Miles ‘n miles n’ miles of heart!!!!

Well, there you have it, a little fun as we await the opening of next year’s fresh new season.

My Best,
Jeff

———————————
Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on. This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional intelligence. To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.

 

 

Categories
conflict resolution disgrace leadership

Leadership: A Lao Tzu Perspective

Welcome to From Insults To Respect.

From time to time, many of us find ourselves in a position of leadership. This may come about because we are a parent, or asked to plan a trip with some friends, or hired to be a supervisor in some business, or elected to some political office. Each time we take on the role of a leader, we also take on the risk, will we end up being respected or insulted. What are some suggestions for guiding us through the possibility of such turbulent waters? Perhaps I can find some sound advice by flipping through my copy of the Tao Te Ching.

For those of you unfamiliar with the Tao Te Ching, the title can be translated as The Book of the Way and Its Virtues. It’s designed to teach inner strength and integrity. The author is thought to be Lao Tzu, an ancient Chinese philosopher and founder of philosophical and religious Taoism.

Although I draw upon this book from time to time, I wouldn’t want anyone to think I’m a strict adherent to that way of thinking or to any of the isms for that matter. Whenever I have a concern, or others ask me to address their concerns, I draw upon a variety of wisdom traditions, and the Tao Te Ching is certainly among the greatest of these.

As I personally deal with a concern, all of the wisdom traditions that I have learned about tend to get all mixed together as if they were in a multi-ingredient soup. Then, I throw into the pot a dash of my own creativity, and voila, I come up with my own unique concoction.

As I flip through the book’s pages, one of the poems catches my interest:

To be in favor or disgrace
is to live in fear.
To take the body seriously
is to admit one can suffer.

What does this mean,
to be in favor or disgrace
is to live in fear?
Favor debases:
we fear to lose it,
fear to win it.
So to be in favor or disgrace
is to live in fear.

I think I’ll stop here for a minute even though there are still two other stanzas to the poem. I want to mull over what I had just read.

A few minutes pass. I think I’m beginning to catch its meaning. To be in favor, is kind of like what I mean when I refer to a person as being respected. And when I think about why someone who is respected might have some fear about being respected, I think about an old saying–“People like to cut down the tallest bamboo tree.”

When a person becomes respected, some people compare themselves to the respected person. If, in this comparison, they come to believe they are not as respected, this may ignite feelings of envy. Some of these people may seek to act in ways that harm the respected person in an effort to bring her or him down to a lower, less threatening, level. I wonder if President John F. Kennedy might have been assassinated because of this type of motivation.

Initially, it was hard for me to see what point Lao Tzu was trying to make here because I often admire people who are respected and try to learn from them. Of course, there are some exceptions to this. Apparently Hitler was respected by many in Germany many years ago. Despite that, I doubt that I would have respected him.

In contrast to my difficulty understanding why to be respected is to live in fear, I have no difficulty understanding why living in disgrace is to live in fear. Bernie Madoff, the former investment advisor who became disgraced for carrying out a massive Ponzi scheme, comes to mind. His disgrace led to him currently serving a lengthy federal prison sentence. People who act in a manner that leads to their disgrace certainly have good reason to fear some bad things will be the result.

Anyway, I guess I’m ready to move on to the next stanza of the poem:

What does that mean,
to take the body seriously
is to admit one can suffer?
I suffer because I’m a body;
if I weren’t a body,
how could I suffer?

That stanza reminds me of the first noble truth of Buddhism. Life is not ideal: it frequently fails to live up to our expectations. Human beings are subject to desires and cravings, but even when we are able to satisfy these desires, the satisfaction is only temporary. Birth brings about suffering, as does aging, illness, the approaching of death, union with what is displeasing, separation from what is pleasing, not to get what one wants, etc.

With this understanding, I guess I’ll move on to the final stanza of this poem to see what insight it might provide regarding leadership.

So people who set their bodily good
before the public good
could be entrusted with the commonwealth,
and people who treated the body politic
as gently as their own body
would be worthy to govern the commonwealth.

Hmmm? Well, I guess there are a few ways to interpret all of this. Here’s my take, and I would love to hear from others about their takes as well.

Upon finishing the whole poem, I remembered three additional relevant passages from the Tao Te Ching.  The first says,

If my mind’s modest,
I walk the great way.
Arrogance
is all I fear.

The second phrase says,

He who strides cannot maintain the pace.
He who makes a show is not enlightened.
He who is self-righteous is not respected.
He who boasts achieves nothing.
He who brags will not endure.

Accept disgrace willingly.
Accept misfortune as the human condition.
Surrender yourself humbly; then you can be trusted to care for all things.
Love the world as your own self; then you can truly care for all things

The Third one says,

Working yet not taking credit,
Leading yet not dominating,
This is the Primal Virtue.

As I include these phrases with the poem, I find myself thinking that major virtues of the Tao Te Ching are to be kind, compassionate, and helpful. These are essential qualities, from the Tao Te Ching perspective, when we seek to do something virtuous for the public good. But, we must first take care to learn to care for our own body, noticing the fear, and then to act to deal effectively with this aspect of our body.

To be aware that to be arrogant, or to seek to be more in favor than others, can be risky. At the same time, awareness that if we do act in ways that could lead to our disgrace, this too can be risky. Such awareness encourages the virtuous person to be humble, and this includes being humble when we make mistakes that lead people to view us as being disgraced.

How to utilize effectively the fear that comes from being in favor, or in disgrace? The virtuous person has learned that to be effective under this set of circumstances is to avoid being domineering and a braggart. By fully and deeply understanding this, he or she becomes worthy to be a leader of the commonwealth.                

There are far more subtle lessons in the Tao Te Ching regarding being virtuous, but this is what came out of my recent visit with its thoughtful pages. I hope you find something nourishing to take away from it.

Before leaving you today, allow me to humbly express the hope that we all remain well as we deal with this wild and crazy world we find ourselves living in these days.

My Best,
Jeff

———————————-

Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on.  This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional and social intelligence. To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.

 

 

Categories
Abraham Lincoln Civility conflict resolution

Civility: An Abraham Lincoln Perspective

Welcome to From Insults to Respect. 

Civility in politics is a rare commodity. Sadly, the insults are bitter and unrelenting as ever. But do disagreements have to lead to the abandoning of civility? To deepen our thinking about this, I invite you to take a little stroll with me along the path Abraham Lincoln took during the USA’s greatest conflict.

Lincoln’s Way Of Responding to People With Different Views From His Own

Lincoln and Douglas

When Lincoln was just getting into politics, there were a few occasions when he wrote some insulting words about his rivals. Then, by about 1842, he decided to cut it out. Rather than to insult his rivals, who typically had supporters Lincoln hoped to switch allegiance to him, he came to understand that it was better to be kind to those who hold opposing opinions. In defending his position that owning slaves is wrong, rather than hurling hatred toward southerners who were supporting it, he explained during one of his debates with Stephen Douglas,

As I have not felt, so I have not expressed any harsh sentiments toward our southern brethren. I have constantly declared, as I really believe, the only difference between them and us, is the difference of circumstances. I have meant to assail the motives of no party, or individual; and if I have, in any instance, (of which I am not conscious) departed from my purpose, I regret it.

Rather than malice toward rivals, he spoke loud enough to be heard, but without shouting, and rather than revealing a heart of anger, his voice communicated sadness and great sincerity. When Douglas argued that by freeing the slaves, this would lead to what many in the audience viewed as the absolute horror of the mixing of blood by the white and black races, Lincoln responded by pointing to the last census at the time. It indicated there were 405,751 mulattoes (a term used to refer to offspring who had both black and white parents) in the United States in 1850. He then went on to say,

Nearly all have sprung from black slaves and white masters… the chances of these black girls ever mixing their blood with that of white people would have been diminished at least to the extent that it could not have been without their consent. But Judge Douglas is delighted to have them be slaves, and not human enough to have a hearing, even if they were free, and thus left subject to the forced concubinage of their masters, and liable to become the mothers of mulattoes in spite of themselves; the very situation that produces nine-tenths of all the mulattoes–all the mixing of blood in the nation.

Notice, if you will, that in the above quote, Lincoln expresses his disagreement with Judge Douglas without any insulting name calling, and yet still manages to powerfully make his point.

During one of the debates with Douglas about slavery, it was Lincoln’s turn to counter what Douglas had just said. He began,

I do not propose to question the patriotism or to assail the motives of any man, but rather to confine myself strictly to the naked merits of the question….Let me say I think I have no prejudice against the southern people. They are just what we would be in their situation. If slavery did not exist among them, they would not introduce it. If it did now exist among us, we should not instantly give it up. This I believe of the masses North and South. Doubtless there are individuals on both sides who would not hold slaves under any circumstances, and others who would gladly introduce slavery anew if it were out of existence…. When southern people tell us they are no more responsible for the origin of slavery than we are, I acknowledge the fact. When it is said that the institution exists, and that it is very difficult to get rid of it in a satisfactory way, I can understand and appreciate the saying. I surely will not blame them for not doing what I should not know how to do it myself.

At another debate, Lincoln responded with relatable reasoned arguments to those who were wondering if they should or should not support slavery. Thus, in describing the meaning of “all men are created equal,” he explained,

All I ask for the negro is that, if you do not like him, let him alone. If God gave him but little, that little let him enjoy. Certainly the negro is not our equal in color–perhaps not in many other respects; still, in the right to put into his mouth the bread that his own hands have earned, he is the equal of every man, white or black. In pointing out that more has been give to you, you cannot be justified in taking away the little which has been given him.

When asked to speak in Chicago, he found many with different nationalities. Many were people asking themselves in what special and particular ways this country was better than the old. Most had no grandfathers who served in the American Revolution because they or their parents arrived afterwards. Speaking to the torch-lighted faces who gathered to hear him speak from the Tremont House balcony, he explained something profound about these peoples’ connection to all Americans:

If they look back to trace their connection with those days of blood, they find they have none; they cannot carry themselves back to the glorious epoch and make themselves feel they are part of us; but when they look through that old Declaration of Independence, they find that those old men say that “We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal,” and they feel that that moral sentiment taught in that day evidences their relationship to those men, that it is the father of all moral principle in them, and that they have a right to claim it as though they were blood of the blood, and flesh of the flesh, of the men who wrote that Declaration; and so they are.

And then he passed on from here to describe the argument made by some that their race, or some other race, is to be treated as inferior. To this, he explained:

What are these arguments? They are the arguments that kings have made for enslaving the people in all ages of the world. You will find that all the arguments in favor of kingcraft were of this class; they always bestrode the necks of the people–not that they wanted to do it, but because the people were better off for being ridden. That is the argument–You work and I eat, you toil and I will enjoy the fruits of it.

To those who believe that without insulting those with whom we disagree it would be impossible to rouse the audience of a candidate, listen for a moment, to the reaction of Lincoln’s no insult Cooper Union speech, as described by a New York Tribune reporter.

There were applause, cheers; hats and handkerchiefs went into the air. He’s the greatest man since St Paul. The tones, the gestures, the kindling eyes, and the mirth-provoking look defy the reporter’s skill. The vast assemblage frequently rang with cheers and shouts of applause. No man ever before made such an impression on his first appeal to a New York audience.

Upon hearing the news that Lincoln had won the 1864 presidential election, he was serenaded by a crowd of supporters. He responded to them, ”

I am thankful to God for this approval of the people. But while deeply grateful for this mark of their confidence in me, if I know my heart, my gratitude is free from any taint of personal triumph. I do not impugn the motives of any one opposed to me. It is no pleasure to me to triumph over any one; but I give thanks to the Almighty for this evidence of the people’s resolution to stand by free government and the rights of humanity.

Lincoln understood that to build a strong country and a better future he would have to work with those who disagreed with him, and that included many who not only disagreed with him, but had launched some pretty rough insults at him when he was running for president. Doris Kearns Goodwin’s insightful book Team of Rivals is the story of Lincoln building his team of advisors that included as central players these very same rivals. A lesser man would have been threatened by this, kept them at arm’s length, and brought in only yes men.

Throughout his presidency, throughout the civil war, he liked to use sentences and phrases such as,

Let us at all times remember that all American citizens are brothers of a common country, and should dwell together in the bonds of fraternal feeling.

and,

..let us judge not, that we be not judged.

And, as the war approached its end, he spoke to the American people, saying:

With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.

Conclusion

Lincoln Memorial

Well, there you have it, an example of a highly successful politician who tried his best to remain civil even when confronted with positions with which he strongly disagreed, and when dealing with people who had not been at all civil to him. In providing this example, I don’t want to accidentally mislead you, so let me be clear about one particular point.

Lincoln would criticize a person’s opinion, and at times this could come across as insulting the person who had expressed the opinion. He often used a little humor to make the point. For example, after Douglas made a particular argument, Lincoln responded that it was as thin as chicken soup made with the shadow of a chicken. Often, even those who disagreed with him would burst out laughing. That said, I hasten to point out that he never let the humorous comment provide his only reason why he disagreed. Instead, he would go on from there to provide clearly stated reasons for his disagreeing.

So, with that clarification, I leave you today with the hope that we can find it in our hearts to express our disagreements in a kind and civil manner.

——————————-

Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on.  This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional intelligence.  To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.

Categories
Bob Dylan conflict resolution

Bob Dylan On Money

Welcome to From Insults To Respect. Today’s topic–money.

The way we handle money can influence how much respect we have for ourselves and others have for us. A classic illustration comes from Charles Dickens’s A Christmas Carol where we find the unforgettable Ebenezer Scrooge transformed by ghostly experiences from a disrespected miser to a lovable, generous employer. As we delve into our topic, we will draw upon a couple of episodes of Bob Dylan’s Theme Time Radio Hour show, both of which happen to be on the theme of money.

Money, Part One

As Bob introduces the first of his two episodes on money, he tells us, with reggae music in the background,

…we’re gonna take our cue from a sign Harry S. Truman kept on his desk: The Buck Stops Here. And not just the buck, the yen, the shekel, the nickel and dime, and if you still subscribe to the barter system, maybe a bushel of corn. So break open your piggy banks and cash in your bonds. This week’s episode of Theme Time Radio Hour is most definitely cash and carry.

Then, Bob plays us a recording of a man who sounds like someone delivering a US service announcement;

Wherever we go we see money being used as a medium of exchange. Money is a convenient method of exchanging many kinds of goods among many persons. Money is also a standard of value. The value of goods is stated in terms of money.

The first song Bob plays for us is the bluesy “That’s What They Want.” Performed by Jerry McCain and His Upstarts, it tells about a guy grieving about the women he knows who are just interested in finding men who have a lot of money, and a Cadillac too.

They don’t want no man,
Who don’t got no cash.
They’ll tell you quite quick,
They don’t mess with trash.

That’s what they want,
Oh yeah, money honey.

They don’t want no lovin’
No 24 hours a day,
They just want to know
When you get your pay.

That’s what they want,
Oh yeah, money honey.

There is some fine harmonica playing on that one. As I interpret the song, the singer appears to be upset with women who view a guy as trash because he doesn’t have money. He’s looking for a gal who would be satisfied with a loving guy who will always be there for her. It captures the tension between wanting a relationship in which all of your material desires are achieved, versus the willingness to give up some, or all of that for someone whom you truly love because of his or her more intrinsic values. Reflective of this tension, over the years, I observed on occasion a guy or gal pointing to someone’s spouse while saying with disdain, “She married for money,” or “He married for money.”

A little later in the show, Bob tells us that some people will do anything for money. And then, setting up the next song, he says:

I almost think we play too much Van Morrison, but then I play one of his records and I say, “No we don’t.” Here’s one that Van recorded back in 1970, from his album, His Band and the Street Choir–“Blue Money.”

Blue money, according to the Urban Dictionary, refers to 100 dollar bills, which got its name from a blue line that goes up and down the bill. But in some circles, it means money from making porn movies. Thus, according to this interpretation, the song is about the singer’s girlfriend making porn movies, which involves engaging in sexual activities for money.

For many, people who make porn movies are looked down upon. There are better ways to make money, they say.

Although I personally believe there are indeed better ways to make money, I have some mixed feelings about completely losing respect for those who do earn money by engaging in sex. It comes from a couple of unique personal experiences.

When I was an undergraduate at Brooklyn College, I drove a taxi in Manhattan to cover my expenses. From time to time, as I was driving past the Port Authority, where buses and trains would bring loads of out-of-towners to the city, a few women dressed in very scanty, sexy outfits would jump in my taxi and tell me to drive around the block. As they peeked out the window, I could tell they had spotted some police officers, and they had me keep circling the block until the men in blue were gone.

Prior to this, I did think of those involved in this type of business in a pretty negative light, but this experience, meeting them in this strange way, well, I got to see a more human side of them as they talked among themselves in the taxi. I still feel that for myself there are far better ways to earn money, but this experience softened my unkind attitude toward those in the “Blue Money” trade.

Later, while a graduate student at the University of Minnesota, I worked at a Juvenile Correctional Facility, where I honed my counseling skills. Several of the female teenagers were in the facility because they had been engaged in prostitution. Here, I got to know what led these young ladies into this path to earn money. All came from extremely stressful financial situations. All were first lured into becoming hooked on drugs, which initially relieved their financially strapped stress. The leaders of the industry provided, at first, the drugs for free, along with other enticing gifts. In time, desperate to feed their addictions, these teenagers found turning tricks were the only way they knew how to survive. Somehow, during the counseling sessions, their humanity came to light, and a more kind and understanding attitude was fostered.

As Bob’s show continues, Bob plays for us, Nic Jones’s “Farewell to the Gold.” It provides a touching story of a man who, with a friend, spends his life hoping to strike it rich by prospecting for gold. In the end, his dream never comes true, and a flood leads to his friend drowning. The story is a metaphor for the real possibility that seeking gold doesn’t always work out well, and it’s important to be aware of this if we are to wisely choose our life’s pursuits.

In another song, this one called “Your Cash Ain’t Nothin’ but Trash,” by the Clovers, we hear about a woman who, in contrast to the women earning money in the Blue Money industry, this woman refuses to lower herself to a guy flashing his roll of dollars:

I was walking down the main track
One night
I met a fine chick
She was built just right

She stopped when I flashed my roll
I told her she could have all of my dough
She turned around and with a frown
She said this ain’t no circus
And I don’t need a clown

Your cash ain’t nothin’ but trash
Your cash ain’t nothin’ but trash
Your cash ain’t nothin’ but trash
And there ain’t no need in your hangin’ around
As this episode winds down, Bob plays us, “You Can’t Take It With You” by Jessie Price. If you like piano, clarinet, and trumpet solos, this number is sure to put a smile on your face. And then, Bob concludes with the following words:

That was, “You Can’t Take It with You,” and one reason you can’t take it with you is that it usually leaves before you do. You know, I’m looking at my bag of records, and I brought too many again–bad planning. There are just too many songs about money to fit into a single hour, and there is no reason to cut fiscal corners. Hell, we did two shows about birds last year so we could do two about money. So, next week, we’ll dig back into our pockets, and continue to look at the filthy lucre. Join us again in seven days as we present part two of the Almighty dollar. Two shows about money, it makes good cents. See you next week.

Part Two

Bob begins part 2 by welcoming us back to the show. And then he says:

If you were listening last week, and if you weren’t, what the hell is wrong with you, but if you were listening last week, you know we started our look at cold hard cash. We had too many songs, so here we are back again.

Soon, Bob plays for us “I’ve Got Money,” sung by an incredibly energetic James Brown. It’s all about a guy who has money but still needs love. Some of the lyrics go like this:

I’ve got money
And now I need love
When I get my lovin’
I’ll be the happy one

The theme, it seems to me, is money without love, is simply not enough for a full life.

At one point, Bob answers his phone:

Bob: Hi caller, you’re on the air.
Caller: Hi Bob.
Bob: Where are you from?
Caller: Carbondale, Illinois.
Bob: What’s your name?
Caller: Carol.
Bob: Well, Carol, what can I do for ya?
Caller: I heard last week’s money show and I really enjoyed it.
Bob: Hey, thanks 
a lot. We worked hard on it.
Caller: It shows. I heard you were doing another one this week, and I was wondering if I could make a request?
Bob: What do you want to hear?
Caller: The Beatles’ song, “Money Can Buy Me Love.”
Bob: Carol, I think it’s, “Money Can’t Buy Me Love.”
Caller: No, No, it’s can buy me love. I have the record, so I know.
Bob: [insisting] Carol, It’s “Money Can’t Buy Me Love.”
Caller: I know you are Mr. Sixties, but I have the record. It’s can buy me love.
Bob: All right, Carol. We’ll look for it. Keep listening.
Caller: Thanks Bob.

Bob then hangs up, let’s out a long sigh, and says, “You can’t help some people. Carol, if you’re still listening, money can not buy you happiness, but it can buy you more places to look. Still looking for that song, but in the meantime, let’s listen to one by the Drifters.”

After some background remarks about the Drifters, Bob plays their song, “Money, Honey.” With the smooth voice of Clyde McPhatter, and some fine sax solos, the lyrics go,

You know, the landlord rang my front door bell
I let it ring for a long, long spell
I went to the window and peeked through the blind,
And asked him to tell me what was on his mind

He said, “Money, honey!
Yes, money, honey!
Mhm, money, honey,
If you want to stay with me.

I was cleaned and skinned and so hard-pressed
I called the woman that I love the best
I finally reached my baby ’bout a half past three
She said, “I’d like to know what you want with me”

I said, “Money, honey!
Money, honey!
Money, honey,
If you want to get along with me”

She screamed and said, “What’s wrong with you?
From this day on, our romance is through.”
I said, “Tell me, baby, face to face
How could another man take my place?”

She said, “Money, honey!
Money, honey!
Money, honey,
If you want to get along with me.
 
Now I learned my lesson,
The wind may blow,
Before I pay I will love them so.

No doubt that in some situations, without money it is hard to get along. The solution, of course, is to find some respected ways to earn some, or find situations where money is not so essential.

As the show draws to an end, Bob tells us:

We spent so much time talking about money, I want to leave you with someone who had an opposing opinion. He’s a smart guy about relativity, and he’s smart about this. We’re talking about Einstein, and he said, “I’m absolutely convinced that no wealth in the world can keep humanity from moving forward. Even in the hands of the most devoted worker the examples of great pure individuals is the only thing that can move us to noble thoughts and deeds. Money only appeals to selfishness and irresistibly invites abuse. Can anyone imagine Moses, Jesus, or Gandhi armed with the bags of money of Carnegie.”  We’ll see you next week with all new themes, dreams, and schemes. 
Well, that’s my post for today. I hope it provides some useful perspective on the relationship between the nature of respect and how one goes about fulfilling a desire for money.
———————————
Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on. This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional intelligence. To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.
Categories
alternatives to DSM conflict resolution

Seeking to Reform the Psychiatric Diagnosis System

Welcome to From Insults To Respect. As several of my earlier blog posts have indicated, many professionals, mental health service users, involuntary patients, and the general public have little, to no respect, for the American Psychiatric Association’s most recent version of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).

Just before the DSM-5 was published, early drafts were made available, and in 2011 the British Psychological Society (BPS) and the American Psychological Association’s Society for Humanistic Psychology expressed concern that:

…clients and the general public are negatively affected by the continued and continuous medicalisation of their natural and normal responses to their experiences; responses which undoubtedly have distressing consequences which demand helping responses, but which do not reflect illnesses so much as normal individual variation…

Additionally, many researchers have pointed out that psychiatric diagnoses are plagued by problems of reliability, validity, and prognostic value.

These concerns, among others, appeared in an Open Letter to the DSM-5 developers that was endorsed by over 15,000 mental health professionals and other individuals, as well as by over 50 professional organizations, including 15 additional divisions of the American Psychological Association. These concerns were largely ignored by the DSM-5 developers.

Since then, we have seen the development of a few proposals for alternative frameworks. Most of them continue to pathologize those seeking mental health services.

In contrast, there is now my own proposed alternative, the Classification and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Concerns (CSM) which I presented at the American Psychological Association’s Annual Convention, and published in a peer reviewed psychology journal (see HERE). The CSM approach recognizes mental health professionals require some classification system for providing a common language for them to communicate about those utilizing their services. These terms must, for practical purposes, be short phrases that are convenient for placing them into titles and search engines, and for efficient/streamlined communication in the often hectic environments of many hospitals and clinics.

However, unlike the CSM, other frameworks being proposed use the term “diagnosis,” which implies that the mental health professional, once providing the diagnosis, now knows the cause of the concerns being expressed by the person seeking services, which is simply not true. Instead, they may have some tentative theory for the cause or be completely puzzled. Nevertheless, to access services, the misleading diagnosis is provided. Moreover, the “diagnostic” terms used identify and locate problems within individuals and labels the individual as having a mental disorder, which is often stigmatizing.

In contrast, the CSM does not seek to label anyone. Instead, it classifies the expressed concerns of those seeking mental health services, using the typical non-jargon phrases employed by them. These phrases would become the short phrases that would be used by mental health professionals for titles and search engines, and for efficient/streamlined communication.

Beyond creating this practical classification system, the CSM then relies on a psychological formulation approach that opens the door to finding causes for these types of concerns in the circumstances of the service seeker’s lives. Locating problems within only individuals, as the DSM-5 does, misses the relational context and undeniable social and structural influences on many of these concerns.

I developed the CSM approach while working with the Task Force on Diagnostic Alternatives of the American Psychological Association’s Division 32 (Society of Humanistic Psychology). That group has not officially supported, as of yet, any single alternative. Instead, it has wisely decided that its next step is to send out a new open letter hoping to garner support for starting a process that will involve all of the mental health stakeholders including former and current mental health service users, individuals who experienced involuntary treatment, their family members, and mental health professionals.

Why bother to create a new open letter to those who are in positions that can really make meaningful changes since the last one was largely ignored? It is because of a deep understanding of how meaningful positive changes do occur. Advocates for change are, at first, largely ignored. Then, through continued advocacy, some meaningful discussions do get underway. And finally, positive changes occur. The process by which women obtained the right to vote is one notable example of this.

So, this letter was created with the flame of hope still flickering within the hearts of many of us.

The letter is addressed to:

Co-Chairs of the World Health Organization Joint Task Force (JTF) on the ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics, 

Stefanie Weber, MD
Head, Medical Vocabularies
German Institute for Medical Documentation and Information (DIMDI)
Waisenhausgasse 36-38A
50676 Cologne, Germany

James Harrison
Director, Research Centre for Injury Studies
Flinders University, Adelaide Australia
GPO Box 2100 Adelaide SA 5001 Australia

Chair, DSM Steering Committee:

Paul S. Appelbaum, MD
Elizabeth K Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law
New York State Psychiatric Institute
1051 Riverside Drive, #122
New York, NY 10032

Coordinator, RDoC:

Bruce N. Cuthbert, PhD
National Institute of Mental Health
NSC BG RM 6200
6001 Executive Boulevard
Rockville MD 20852

I was one of the consultants that helped to craft the letter. Among the main points that it seeks to make are:

In practice, diagnoses are not conferred in a contextual vacuum. The criteria are not culture or value-free but instead reflect current normative social expectations. At the same time, psychiatric diagnoses have substantial impact on the social and occupational lives of those to whom they are applied. And reductionist biomedical diagnoses obscure the social determinants of our distress. This is important: as the United Nations Special Rapporteur concluded in 2017, we are under an international obligation to ensure that mental healthcare adequately addresses social contexts and relationships.

The letter concludes:

As a next step to address these concerns, we request an online, telephone or in-person meeting to discuss these issues in more depth. We look forward to your response.

Readers of this blog are invited to read this letter HERE. 

My Best,

Jeff  

Categories
Alternative treatments for psychosis antipsychotic drugs conflict resolution

If Not Antipsychotics, Then What?

Welcome to From Insults to Respect. Today we once again take up the controversial topic of the usefulness of the group of drugs referred to by psychiatrists and the pharmaceutical industry as “antipsychotics.” In most of the articles that I have read that have been written by psychiatrists, “antipsychotic” drugs are the first line of treatment for schizophrenia. And yet, a growing number of mental health advocates have been fiercely critical of this. As someone who has given considerable thought to helping people resolve challenging conflicts, I set myself on trying to find out what is going on here. After a review of the scientific research and participating in several debates, I then wrote three blog posts that reported to my readers what I have found.

In the first post, I conclude that the weight of the evidence indicates these drugs are causing far more harm than good. In the second post, I explain how people come to have the illusion that these drugs are helpful. Upon publishing the first two posts, several defenders of the use of these drugs claimed these drugs are worth using because they reduce the risk of early mortality. I, therefore, published a third post that reviews the mortality research studies. As it turns out, some rather weak evidence does exist that appears to support a positive correlation between “antipsychotic” use by those labelled as having schizophrenia and reduced early mortality. However, those studies have significant flaws and more convincing evidence exists suggesting these drugs actually increase the risk of early mortality.

A recent article published in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet, succinctly summarizes much of this research:

[The evidence] “shows that many patients choose to refuse or discontinue their pharmacological treatment…. Patients with psychosis are often ambivalent about taking drugs, and evidence suggests that the effectiveness of such drugs has been overestimated, whereas the severity of their adverse effects have been underestimated. A systematic review concluded that the improvements claimed for antipsychotics are of questionable clinical relevance, and a multiple-treatments meta-analysis showed that although differences in efficacy between antipsychotics and placebo were noted, they were smaller than those for most of the analysed adverse effects. Research suggests that adverse effects include structural abnormalities in brain volume, increased risk of sudden cardiac death, and substantial weight gain induced by antipsychotics, which is associated with cardiovascular and metabolic risks.”

In addition to the adverse effects and lack of clinically meaningful positive effects, there is an enormous cost to using these drugs, costs that are siphoning off resources that could be better used for more healthy alternatives. The cost for the drug approach is not just confined to the cost of the “antipsychotic” drugs which has been estimated to be in the range of several billions of dollars. Doctors often prescribe a whole cocktail of drugs for these patients, dramatically adding to the cost of the drug approach, while evidence indicates the combination of “antipsychotics” with these other drugs often leads to additional adverse effects. The cost of the doctors’ time for prescribing and monitoring the treatment must be added, as well, as the cost of the revolving door of placement in a hospital, releasing from the hospital, and readmitting to the hospital, which has been the frequent pattern with this drugging approach. Finally, we must add the cost of treating patients for all of the adverse effects of these drugs.

Given all of these problems, what alternatives to “antipsychotic” drug management are out there?

The Alternatives

There are several very promising alternatives, but in most regions they are not yet available. Articles like mine are designed to expand the general population’s knowledge of just how ineffective, harmful, and financially wasteful the drug treatments are, and that there are safer alternatives. This increased awareness campaign has been a major reason for the slow rising tide of advocates demanding that these more healthy alternatives become readily accessible in every community.

With this background, let’s take a look at these more healthy, humane alternatives.

Cognitive Therapy

study funded by England’s National Institute for Health Research was published in 2014, that carried out a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Participants aged 16–65 years who were labelled as having schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and who had chosen not to take antipsychotic drugs, were randomly assigned to either receive cognitive therapy plus treatment as usual, or just treatment as usual. Outcome assessors were masked to group allocation.

The authors summarized their results as follows:

“Cognitive therapy significantly reduced psychiatric symptoms and seems to be a safe and acceptable alternative for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders who have chosen not to take antipsychotic drugs. Evidence-based treatments should be available to these individuals. A larger, definitive trial is needed.

The central features of this treatment for this group of patients involve normalization and evaluation of the appraisals that people make, helping them to test such appraisals with use of behavioral experiments, and helping them to identify and modify unhelpful cognitive and behavioral responses. Additionally, it aimed to provide warm, empathic, and non-judgmental face-to-face contact, supportive listening, signposting to appropriate local services for unmet needs, and crisis management when needed.

Treatment as usual was variable across both sites. In practice, participants within these services received regular care-coordination and psychosocial interventions, including the offer of family interventions.
On average, neither group deteriorated over time, in a population that has been assumed to deteriorate without total adherence to drugs; in fact, some participants receiving treatment as usual who were not taking drugs achieved good clinical outcomes, and more did with the addition of cognitive therapy. The study also showed that cognitive therapy is an acceptable intervention for a population who are usually considered to be very challenging to engage by mental health services, with low rates of drop out and withdrawal. The effect size on psychiatric symptoms in the study is similar to the median effect size reported for overall symptoms in a large meta-analysis of 15 antipsychotic drugs versus placebo.

Humanistic Approaches

Image may contain: text

A recent issue of the Journal Of Humanistic Psychology (JHP) is devoted to the humanistic perspective on understanding and responding to extreme states. There you will find several non-antipsychotic approaches for addressing psychological concerns that are labelled as schizophrenia by psychiatrists.

In one of the articles, Yana Jacobs, who once worked as a staff member at Soteria House, tells us about its approach. Funded by the National Institute of Mental Health, Soteria House provided a place to live for people who fit the criteria for schizophrenia and having their first episode. These patients were given the choice of staying at the hospital where they had first been labelled, or coming to Soteria, where “antipsychotics” usually would not be used. As Yana describes the program,

“All six residents were given their own private room and had the freedom to do what they felt like. This might include staying in their bedroom, sleeping all day, or hanging out in a living room and listening to music or chatting with whomever was around. Relationships developed naturally, and we all got to know one another to various degrees, no different than how we develop friendships. This was not a therapist-patient relationship but rather a sort of social relationship. As a staff member I had some responsibilities—going to the market and preparing dinner. Everyone was on their own for breakfast and lunch and could help themselves to whatever they might like. Grocery shopping was often an outing to the market. Usually, one or two residents would accompany me to the store. When we returned, I would ask for help prepping the meal. It was quite informal. The house was often a bit of a mess, but then, we’d all get together and decide it was time for a quick house cleaning and again, whoever wanted to join would do so.”

For those who have come to believe that without the use of “antipsychotics” all hell would break out and the world would pretty much come to an end, consider Yana’s experience:

“I never felt like I was ‘working,’ and honestly, I loved being at Soteria so much that it wasn’t till the end of my employment that I even took note of how much I was being paid. There’s something about being with people when they are going through a difficult time that is such a privilege and truly an honor to be part of this intimate journey.”

Yana explains that there were times when someone was going through deep pain, tears, screaming, throwing things, and sleeplessness, “but always something would emerge and calm would eventually arrive, you really had to have faith in the process.”

Since the original Soteria House opened and funding ran out, several other programs based on a similar model took its place. Berne, Switzerland has had a Soteria House since 1984, and Soteria houses in Vermont and Israel recently opened.

Soteria House programs are designed to help people through an original episode of an extreme experience typically labeled as schizophrenia. The stay at one of these houses lasts for just a few months.

Another approach well described in the JHP special issue is written by Charles Knapp. The Windhorse therapeutic perspective has a Tibetan Buddhist orientation that offers meditation, and spiritual teachings, along with a supportive, empathetic staff. Unlike the Soteria House approach, which aims to support people through a recovery process over a few months, the Windhorse approach recognizes that individual recovery periods are highly variable, and it is not uncommon for people to stay in their programs for eighteen months and even longer.

There are several other approaches described in the JHP special issue, all worth while to think about. All have had their share of success in helping to provide support for people experiencing extreme states.

That said, I would be negligent if I didn’t say that no approach currently available manages to avoid having some disappointing results. This is true for the standard medical model which urges all people labelled as having schizophrenia to immediately take “antipsychotics,” and it is also true for all of the alternative approaches discussed above. However, those alternatives lead to far fewer people eventually choosing to take “antipsychotics,” thus decreasing the chances of people experiencing the various adverse effects associated with consuming “antipsychotics.”

Beyond the decreased risk of “antipsychotic” adverse effects, available research can not say for sure that these alternatives lead to additional improved life outcomes. Nevertheless, results have been very encouraging, and it is high time that these alternatives become far more accessible while high quality ongoing research better assesses what works well, and what needs to be modified.

———————————
Some people will enjoy reading this blog by beginning with the first post and then moving forward to the next more recent one; then to the next one; and so on. This permits readers to catch up on some ideas that were presented earlier and to move through all of the ideas in a systematic fashion to develop their emotional intelligence. To begin at the very first post you can click HERE.